17,163
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Start History section.
The '''sexual effects of circumcision''' are the subject of some debate. Studies have been conducted to investigate the effect of circumcision (amputation of the [[foreskin]]) on sexual drive, erectile function, premature and delayed ejaculation, sexual satisfaction, sexual sensation and penile sensitivity. Studies have also assessed whether [[circumcision]] affects [[masturbation]] or other sexual practices, and the degree to which a heterosexual woman's experience of sex is affected by her partner's circumcision status.
==History==
The human foreskin was once thought to have little or no sexual function. Sex researcher Alfred C. Kinsey (1948) placed no importance on the presence or absence of the foreskin.<ref name="kinsey1948">{{REFbook
|last=Kinsey
|first=Alfred C.
|author-link=
|last2=Pemeroy
|first2=AC
|author2-link=
|year=1948
|title=Sexual Behavior in the Human Male
|url=
|work=
|editor=
|edition=
|volume=
|chapter=
|pages=
|location=
|publisher=A. C. Saunders
|isbn=
|quote=
|accessdate=2019-12-21
|note=
}}</ref>
<!--Only medical trade associations, such as the [[American Academy of Pediatrics]] (AAP), which represents doctors who profit from carrying out circumcisions, still contend that circumcision does not harm sexual function. The American Academy of Pediatrics points to a survey (self-report) finding circumcised adult men had less sexual dysfunction and more varied sexual practices, but also noted anecdotal reports that penile sensation and sexual satisfaction are decreased for circumcised males.<ref name="AAP1999">{{REFjournal