17,059
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
→Legal proceedings: Minor text editing for clarity.
}}</ref>
</blockquote>
The child’s proposed circumcision, at one point only hours away, remains judicially prohibitedso the proposed circumcision was never carried out.<ref name="geisheker2010">{{REFjournal
|last=Geisheker
|first=John V.
[[Doctors Opposing Circumcision (D.O.C.)]] filed two ''amicus curiae'' briefs in this case and was successful in protecting the boy's [[foreskin]] from [[circumcision]].
The case also set a legal precedent regarding the rights of the male child to legal judicial protection of his person.
==Commentary on Boldt v. Boldt==