22,335
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m
|archived=
|trans-title=
|language=
wikify HIV
Na et al. (2015) considered whether Australian boys should be circumcised. They concluded:
<blockquote>In conclusion, although there is a benefit of circumcision in those with urogenital tract anomalies, in a healthy newborn,the disease in the foreskin is non-existent. There is insufficient scientific evidence to support routine newborn circumcision in Australia done for UTI risk and [[HIV ]] transmission issues alone. Therefore, any surgical complication and financial cost of routine newborn circumcision for these reasons in Australia currently cannot be justified. From a medical point of view, the‘price’ is still too high.<ref name="na2015">{{REFjournal
|last=Na
|first=Angelika F.
===Continuing decline in practice of non-therapeutic circumcision===
Na, Tanny & Hutson (2015) discussed the matter of non-therapeutic circumcision of children in Australia. They concluded:
<blockquote>There is insufficient scientific evidence to support routine newborn circumcision in Australia done for UTI risk and [[HIV ]] transmission issues alone. Therefore, any surgical complication and financial cost of routine newborn circumcision for these reasons in Australia currently cannot be justified. From a medical point of view, the ‘price’ is still too high.<ref>{{REFjournal
|last=Na
|first=Angelika F.
According to a report on SBS,<ref>{{REFweb
|url=https://www.sbs.com.au/news/why-is-the-number-of-male-circumcisions-declining-in-australia/7ed6f0f3-23a2-4717-a125-494bd6554b7f
|title=Why is the number of male circumcisions declining in Australia?
|last=Yosufzai
|first=Rashida