Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search

Sex As Nature Intended It

2 bytes added, 10 January
Critics
== Critics ==
The [[circumcision advocate]] website [[Andrew Gross#Circumcision Choice|Circumcision Choice]] debunked challenged the flaws and bias of O'Hara's study which is the basis of this book. While most some of the counter-arguments by [[Andrew Gross#Circumcision Choice|Circumcision Choice]] seem to be valid, the refutation itself also uses wordings which expose the [[Bias| biased view]] pro -circumcision of the ostensibly anonymous author of the refutation which seems to be [[Andrew Gross]].<ref>{{REFweb
|url=https://www.circumcisionchoice.com/single-post/ohara
|title=Sex as the researcher intended it
11
edits

Navigation menu