22,328
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m
|trans-title=
|language=
|trans-title=
|language=
|last2=
|first2=
|author2-link=
|last3=
|first3=
|author3-link=
|last4=
|first4=
|author4-link=
|last5=
|first5=
|author5-link=
|last6=
|first6=
|author6-link=
|last7=
|first7=
|author7-link=
|last8=
|first8=
|author8-link=
|last9=
|first9=
|author9-link=
|trans-title=
|language=
|last2=
|first2=
|author2-link=
|last3=
|first3=
|author3-link=
|last4=
|first4=
|author4-link=
|last5=
|first5=
|author5-link=
|last6=
|first6=
|author6-link=
|last7=
|first7=
|author7-link=
|last8=
|first8=
|author8-link=
|last9=
|first9=
|author9-link=
|trans-title=
|language=
|url=
10.1093/pch/20.6.311
|last2=
|first2=
|author2-link=
|last3=
|first3=
|author3-link=
|last4=
|first4=
|author4-link=
|last5=
|first5=
|author5-link=
|last6=
|first6=
|author6-link=
|last7=
|first7=
|author7-link=
|last8=
|first8=
|author8-link=
|last9=
|first9=
|author9-link=
|trans-title=
|language=
|trans-title=
|language=
reformattings
|etal=no
|title=Current circumcision practices: Canada
|journal=Pediatrics
|location=
}}</ref>
==Position statements of medical societies.==
The [[Canadian Paediatric Society]] (CPS) took a position against non-therapeutic circumcision of boys in 1975, declaring it to have "no medical indication" and to be an "obsolete operation".<ref name="cps1975">{{REFjournal
|last=Swyer
|first=PRP.R.
|author-link=
|last2=Boston
|first2=RWR.W.
|author2-link=
|last3=Murdock
|first3=A.
|author3-link=
|last4=Paré
|first4=C.
|author4-link=
|last5=Rees
|first5=E.
|author5-link=
|last6=Segal
|first6=S.
|author6-link=
|last7=Sinclair
|first7=JCJ.C.
|author7-link=
|etal=no
|title=FN 75 Circumcision in the newborn period
|journal=CPS News Bull Suppl
|location=
|first=Eugene
|author-link=
|etal=yes
|title=Neonatal circumcision revisited
|journal=Can Med Assoc J
|location=
<blockquote>While there may be a benefit for some boys in high-risk populations and circumstances where the procedure could be considered for disease reduction or treatment, the Canadian Paediatric Society does not recommend the routine circumcision of every newborn male.<ref name="cps2015">{{REFjournal
|last=Sorokin
|first=S . Todd
|author-link=
|etal=yes
|title=Newborn male circumcision
|journal=Paediatr Child Health
|location=
|issue=6
|pages=311-20
|quote=
|pubmedID=26435672
|first=Sumit
|author-link=
|etal=yes
|title=
|journal=Can Urol Assoc J
|location=
|quote=
}}</ref>
==Availability of third-party payment==
|author-link=
|last2=Muller
|first2=Andries J.
|author2-link=
|etal=no
|title=Parents' rationale for male circumcision
|journal=Can Fam Physician
|location=
==Reasons for circumcision==
Rediger & Muller (2013) found "newborn male circumcision rates continue to be heavily influenced by the circumcision status of the child's father."<ref name="rediger-muller2013" />
==Canadian circumcision deaths==
|language=
|last=Newell
|first=TECT.E.C.
|author-link=
|publisher=British Columbia Coroner's Service
|quote=
}}
{{REF}}