22,208
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m
adjusted some REFs
|season?Winter
|date=1997
}}</ref> by Paul Fleiss appeared in the popular mothers’ magazine “''Mothering''”. This is the first documentation of the ‘fact’, that the [[foreskin]] contains "more than 20,000 nerve endings". Fleiss referred to an article from 1932 by the English physiologist H. C. Bazett (1885-1950) together with other authors within a medical scientific journal.<ref name="bazett1932">{{REFjournal |last=Bazett |init=HC, |last2=McGlone |init2=B, |last3=Willams |init3=RG, |last4=Lufkin |init4=HM. [ |url=http://www.cirp.org/library/anatomy/bazett/ |title=I. Depth, distribution and probable identification in the prepuce of sensory end-organs concerned in sensations of temperature and touch thermo-metric conductivity]. '' |journal=Arch Neurol Psychiatry'' |date=1932; |volume=27( |issue=3): |pages=489-517.}}</ref>
The popular American pediatrician [[Paul Fleiss]] (1933-2014), in empathy with the children, was very active against the genital mutilation of newborns by [[RIC]](non-therapeeutic) (Routine Infant Circumcision) in USA. Fleiss, [[Marilyn Milos|Marilyn F. Milos]], and alongside them many other [intactivist]] pioneers, have contributed enormously to explaining its negative consequences. Fleiss knew of the article by Bazett et al. (1932) through the medical historian F. Hodges. Fleiss and Hodges were well known to each other. They appeared both in the 1995 film “[[Whose Body, Whose Rights?]]”<ref name="WhoseBody">[{{REFweb |url=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W0kr6BiVZMM |title=film "Whose Body, Whose Rights?"] |publisher=YouTube}}</ref>, and together they co-authored several articles<ref>Letter; Neonatal circumcision does not protect against penile cancer; [[foreskin]] IS NECESSARY; [[AIDS]] and circumcision; Circumcision in infancy; Authors’ reply; Immunological functions of the human prepuce</ref> and two books<ref name="SweetDreams">a) Sweet Dreams 2000; b) www.amazon.com/What-Your-Doctor-About-Circumcision/dp/0446678805 2002</ref>. In “The Case Against Circumcision” Fleiss referred to Hodges’ article: “A short history of circumcision in the United States” from Jan. 1997, wherein Hodges writes about Bazett’s “detailed anatomical description of the innervation of the [[foreskin]].”<ref>http://www.historyofcircumcision.net/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=90&Itemid=0: Fn 50</ref>
The dissemination of Fleiss’ article took place through the Intactivist movement through [[NOCIRC]], [[Doctors Opposing Circumcision (D.O.C.)]]], [[NOHARMM]], NRC and “[[Mothers Against Circumcision]]”, amongst others.<ref>http://www.nocirc.org/; http://www.doctorsopposingcircumcision.org/; http://www.noharmm.org/; http://childrightsnurses.org/; “For More Information”: http://www.mothersagainstcirc.org/fleiss.html</ref>
|first=
|accessdate=
}}</ref> - In the link to Bazett ''et al'' . there is not no such a number.
* Book of [[Matthias Franz|M. Franz]]: '''„Die Beschneidung von Jungen – Ein trauriges Vermächtnis“''': Even there it is without proof: "it [the [[foreskin]]] has around 20,000 nerve endings, ..." - The reference to Hartman 2012 contains no number and the on Jaermann 2010 gives "over 1000": '''Scheinfeld''' in [[Matthias Franz|M. Franz]], Die Beschneidung von Jungen, 2014, p. 364