22,208
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m
wikify
The "[[German Circumcision Act|Circumcision Act]]" as it is called now everywhere, is in fact a [[Special Law|"Special law for Jews"]], since in its second paragraph it clearly aims on the [[circumcision]] of male infants. Muslim religious representatives have been complaining about this paragraph because it would not treat them equally.
I am saying that this amendmend would be a rollback into the history of [[human rights ]] and would absolutely harm the well-being of the child. It is important to look at the development of Section 1631 in its history. Its oldest version dates from the end of the 19th century.
'''At that time, it looked like this:'''
Currently, however, the debate provides a ''rolback to old times'', actually back to the year 1900, because it aims at giving back the parents education right power over the child's body.
This rollback must be prevented by all means, if we do not want to set our development as a secular, enlightened, democratic society which orients towards [[human rights]], at risk. ("Resist the Beginnings!")
The Civil Code Section 1931 "Contents and limits of care for the person of the child" should indeed remain as it is, however get a controversial supplement § 1631 d, according to the vociferous arguments of Orthodox religious spokesmen who have intimidated the Parliament, as follows: