Difference between revisions of "Australia"
WikiModEn2 (talk | contribs) (Add Gairdner) |
WikiModEn2 (talk | contribs) m (Add URL) |
||
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
|issue=4642 | |issue=4642 | ||
|pages=1433-1437 | |pages=1433-1437 | ||
| − | |url= | + | |url=https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2051968/pdf/brmedj03656-0009.pdf |
|quote= | |quote= | ||
|pubmedID=15408299 | |pubmedID=15408299 | ||
Revision as of 13:58, 28 October 2019
Construction Site
This article is work in progress and not yet part of the free encyclopedia IntactiWiki.
A report on circumcision in Australia.
Australia, like other English-speaking countries, once had a rather high rate of non-therapeutic neonatal circumcision of male infants, however Australia now has a very low rate of non-therapeutic neonatal circumcision.
History
The incidence of non-therapeutic neonatal circumcision in Australia approached that of the United States in the 1930s through 1960s.
Douglas Gairdner,s famous, classic paper, The Fate of the Foreskin: A Study of Circumcision,[1] seems to have had no effect in Australia.
The Australian Paediatric Journal issue of June 1970, published three articles critical of non-therapeutic infant circumcision.[2][3][4]
References
- ↑
Gairdner, Douglas M.. The fate of the foreskin: a study of circumcision. British Medical Journal. 1949; 2(4642): 1433-1437. PMID. PMC. DOI. Retrieved 28 October 2019.
- ↑ Leitch, I.O., et al. Circumcision: the continuing enigma. Aust Paediatr J. 1 March 1970; 6(1): 59-65. PMID. Retrieved 27 October 2019.
- ↑ Birrell, R.G.. Circumcision. Aust Paediatr J. 1 June 1960; 6(2): 66-7. PMID. Retrieved 27 October 2019.
- ↑ Smith, E.D.. Another view of circumcision. Aust Paediatr J. 1 June 1970; 6(2): 67-9. PMID. Retrieved 27 October 2019.
