15,558
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
→Scientific references
}}</ref>
* [[Ronald Goldman|Goldman]] (1999) reports reported circumcised doctors will write papers to support non-therapeutic circumcision:
{{Citation
|Text=One reason that flawed studies are published is that science is affected by cultural values. A principal method of preserving cultural values is to disguise them as truths that are based on scientific research. This 'research' can then be used to support questionable and harmful cultural values such as circumcision. This explains the claimed medical 'benefits' of circumcision.
|Author=[[Ronald Goldman]]
|ref=<ref name="goldman1999"/>
* [[Ronald Goldman|Goldman]] (2004) stated: "On the other hand, there are various factors that may contribute to or suggest a bias in favour of circumcision. A survey of randomly selected primary care physicians showed that circumcision was more often supported by doctors who were older, male and circumcised."<ref>{{REFjournal |last=Goldman |first= |init= |author-link= |last2= |first2= |init2= |author2-link= |last3= |first3= |init3= |author3-link= |last4= |first4= |init4= |author4-link= |last5= |first5= |init5= |author5-link= |last6= |first6= |init6= |author6-link= |last7= |first7= |init7= |author7-link= |last8= |first8= |init8= |author8-link= |last9= |first9= |init9= |author9-link= |etal=no |title=Circumcision policy: A psychosocial perspective |trans-title= |language= |journal= |location= |date=2004 |volume= |issue= |article= |page= |pages= |url= |archived= |quote= |pubmedID= |pubmedCID= |DOI= |accessdate=}}</ref>
* Andries J. Muller (2010) conducted a survey of Saskatchewan medical doctors in specialties that perform non-therapeutic neonatal circumcision. He reported "the circumcision status of, especially, the male respondents played a huge role in whether they were in support of circumcision, or not." The circumcision status of their sons was a secondary factor.<ref>{{REFjournal