Difference between revisions of "Circumcision legal commentary"
WikiModEn2 (talk | contribs) (Create page.) |
WikiModEn2 (talk | contribs) (Add text.) |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
'''Circumcision legal commentary''' has been published for about the last forty years in several nations by different authors who have a variety of views. The intent of this page is to collect such circumcision legal commentary in the English language as can be found online and link to it. Material will be arranged in approximate chronological order of publication. | '''Circumcision legal commentary''' has been published for about the last forty years in several nations by different authors who have a variety of views. The intent of this page is to collect such circumcision legal commentary in the English language as can be found online and link to it. Material will be arranged in approximate chronological order of publication. | ||
| − | Canadian medical ethicicist Margaret Somerville published a commentary on the distinctions between therapeutic medical procedures and non-therapeutic medical procedures. Since the circumcision of male infants is a non-therapeutic procedure, her remarks are relevant here. | + | Canadian medical ethicicist Margaret Somerville (1980) published a commentary on the distinctions between therapeutic medical procedures and non-therapeutic medical procedures. Since the circumcision of male infants is a non-therapeutic procedure, her remarks are relevant here. |
* {{REFjournal | * {{REFjournal | ||
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
|pages=82-96 | |pages=82-96 | ||
|url=http://www.cirp.org/library/legal/somerville/ | |url=http://www.cirp.org/library/legal/somerville/ | ||
| + | |accessdate=2020-05-08 | ||
| + | }} | ||
| + | |||
| + | American Williame E. Brigman (1985) used new medical evidence to argue that circumcision is child abuse, and discussed possible legal remedies. Recent medical articles have documented the actual injury of circumcision, to make it possible for an attorney to win damages for wrongful circumcision. Brigman suggested civil rights class action suits against hospitals. | ||
| + | |||
| + | * {{REFjournal | ||
| + | |last=Brigman | ||
| + | |first=William E. | ||
| + | |author-link= | ||
| + | |title=Circumcision as Child Abuse: The Legal and Constitutional Issue | ||
| + | |journal=J Fam Law | ||
| + | |date=1985 | ||
| + | |volume=23 | ||
| + | |issue=3 | ||
| + | |pages=337 | ||
| + | |url=http://www.cirp.org/library/legal/brigman/ | ||
|accessdate=2020-05-08 | |accessdate=2020-05-08 | ||
}} | }} | ||
Revision as of 10:34, 8 May 2020
Construction Site
This article is work in progress and not yet part of the free encyclopedia IntactiWiki.
Circumcision legal commentary has been published for about the last forty years in several nations by different authors who have a variety of views. The intent of this page is to collect such circumcision legal commentary in the English language as can be found online and link to it. Material will be arranged in approximate chronological order of publication.
Canadian medical ethicicist Margaret Somerville (1980) published a commentary on the distinctions between therapeutic medical procedures and non-therapeutic medical procedures. Since the circumcision of male infants is a non-therapeutic procedure, her remarks are relevant here.
Somerville, Margaret. Medical Interventions and the Criminal Law. McGill Law Journal. 1980; 26(82): 82-96. Retrieved 8 May 2020.
American Williame E. Brigman (1985) used new medical evidence to argue that circumcision is child abuse, and discussed possible legal remedies. Recent medical articles have documented the actual injury of circumcision, to make it possible for an attorney to win damages for wrongful circumcision. Brigman suggested civil rights class action suits against hospitals.
- Brigman, William E.. Circumcision as Child Abuse: The Legal and Constitutional Issue. J Fam Law. 1985; 23(3): 337. Retrieved 8 May 2020.