22,208
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m
|trans-title=
|language=English
|trans-title=
|language=English
|trans-title=
|language=English
|trans-title=
|language=English
renamed subtitles
}}
=== United Kingdom UK ===
The [https://www.bma.org.uk/ British Medical Association] 28-page statement (2019) focuses on legal and ethical advice to its fellows to help keep them out of trouble in a legal and regulatory environment that is increasingly unfriendly to practitioners of non-therapeutic male circumcision. It has little to say about the medical aspects of non-therapeutic circumcision. To its credit it cites the [https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1998/42/contents#aofs Human Rights Act 1998] and calls for practitioners to respect the child's rights under that act.
|archived=
|title=Non-therapeutic male circumcision (NTMC) of children – practical guidance for doctors
|last=
|first=
}}
===US statementsUSA === The United States is are unique because the American medical industry has been promoting the practice of non-therapeutic circumcision since the late 19th Century.<ref>{{REFjournal
|last=Gollaher
|first=David
|etal=no
|title=Circumcision in the United States
|journal=JAMA
|location=
|last=Hill
|first=George
|author-link=George Hill
|publisher=Doctors Opposing Circumcision
|format=PDF
|accessdate=2020-08-03
}}
* {{REFjournal
|last=Blank
|etal=no
|title=Circumcision Policy Statement
|journal=Pediatrics
|location=
|accessdate=2020-08-02
}}
* {{REFjournal
|last=Task Force on Circumcision
|etal=no
|title=Male Circumcision
|journal=Pediatrics
|location=