Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search

Ethics of non-therapeutic child circumcision

125 bytes added, 00:43, 27 May 2023
Observations: Add new section.
|format=
|quote=As they saying goes, follow the money. Now you know why neither the [[American Academy of Pediatrics]], American Medical Association, [[American Academy of Family Physicians]], or the [[American Congress of Obstetricians and Gynecologists| American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists]] haven’t condemned this unnecessary surgery, and why their physician members are quick to recommend the procedure to expectant parents.
}}</ref> [[Third-party payment]] is a major support to the performance of this medically-unnecessary surgery. If parents could not grant consent for non-therapeutic circumcision, then no one could grant consent for the non-therapeutic circumcision of a child, so the $2 billion annual business would collapse. The American [[Medical trade association| medical trade associations]], more than those of other nations, have been unwilling to recognize the child's right to bodily [[physical integrity]], to security of the person, and the right to personal autonomy. == The emerging consensus on surrogate consent for non-therapeutic newborn, infant, and child circumcision ==
15,238
edits

Navigation menu