Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search

Ethics of non-therapeutic child circumcision

108 bytes removed, 14:34, 1 November 2019
Starting adaption of article to IntactiWiki.
Male [[circumcision]] is the surgical removal of the [[foreskin]] (prepuce) from the [[human penis]].<ref name=sawyer_2011>{{vcite book |author=Sawyer S |title=Pediatric Physical Examination & Health Assessment |pages=555–556 |date=November 2011 |publisher=Jones & Bartlett Publishers |isbn=978-1-4496-7600-1 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=W6eRUtlujbkC&pg=PA555}}</ref> The '''ethics of non-therapeutic child circumcision''' being imposed on unconsenting minors ([[babies]] and [[children]]) has been a source of ongoing [[Circumcision controversies|controversy]].<ref>{{cite journal | author = Boyle G.J., Svoboda J.S., Price C. P., Turner J.N. | year = 2000 | title = Circumcision of healthy boys: Criminal assault? | url = | journal = Journal of Law and Medicine | volume = 7 | issue = | pages = 301–310 }}</ref><ref name="RACPSumm">{{cite web|url=http://www.racp.edu.au/download.cfm?DownloadFile=A453CFA1-2A57-5487-DF36DF59A1BAF527|title=Policy Statement On Circumcision|accessdate=2007-02-28|date=September 2004|format=PDF|publisher=[[Royal Australasian College of Physicians]]|quote=The Paediatrics and Child Health Division, The [[Royal Australasian College of Physicians]] (RACP) has prepared this statement on routine circumcision of infants and boys to assist parents who are considering having this procedure undertaken on their male children and for doctors who are asked to advise on or undertake it. After extensive review of the literature the RACP reaffirms that '''there is no medical indication for routine neonatal circumcision.''' Circumcision of males has been undertaken for religious and cultural reasons for many thousands of years. It remains an important ritual in some religious and cultural groups.…In recent years there has been evidence of possible health benefits from routine male circumcision. The most important conditions where some benefit may result from circumcision are urinary tract infections, HIV and later cancer of the penis.…The complication rate of neonatal circumcision is reported to be around 1% and includes tenderness, bleeding and unhappy results to the appearance of the penis. Serious complications such as bleeding, septicaemia and may occasionally cause death (1 in 550,000). The possibility that routine circumcision may contravene human rights has been raised because circumcision is performed on a minor and is without proven medical benefit. Whether these legal concerns are valid will be known only if the matter is determined in a court of law. If the operation is to be performed, the medical attendant should ensure this is done by a competent operator, using appropriate anaesthesia anesthesia and in a safe child-friendly environment. In all cases where parents request a circumcision for their child the medical attendant is obliged to provide accurate information on the risks and benefits of the procedure. Up-to-date, unbiased written material summarizing the evidence should be widely available to parents. Review of the literature in relation to risks and benefits shows there is no evidence of benefit outweighing harm for circumcision as a routine procedure in the neonate. |archiveurl = https://web.archive.org/web/20080720092409/http://www.racp.edu.au/download.cfm?DownloadFile=A453CFA1-2A57-5487-DF36DF59A1BAF527 |archivedate = 2008-07-20}}</ref><ref name = "BMAGuide">{{vcite web| url = http://www.bma.org.uk/ap.nsf/Content/malecircumcision2006?OpenDocument&Highlight=2,circumcision| title = The law and ethics of male circumcision - guidance for doctors| accessdate = 2006-07-01| author = Medical Ethics Committee|date=June 2006| publisher = [[British Medical Association]]|archiveurl = https://web.archive.org/web/20071112055050/http://www.bma.org.uk/ap.nsf/Content/malecircumcision2006?OpenDocument&Highlight=2,circumcision |archivedate = 2007-11-12}}</ref>
Some medical associations take the position that the parents should determine what is in the best interest of the infant or child.<ref name="AAP1999">{{vcite journal | author=Task force on circumcision | title=Circumcision policy statement | journal=Pediatrics | date=1999 | volume=103 | issue=3 | pages=686–93 | url=http://pediatrics.aappublications.org/content/103/3/686 | doi=10.1542/peds.103.3.686 | pmid= 10049981 | pmc= }}</ref> Others say that circumcision is an infringement of the child's autonomy and should be prolonged until he is capable of making the decision himself.<ref>{{Cite book|url=https://books.google.com/?id=C1T6NrSPD_AC|title=Clinical Ethics in Pediatrics: A Case-Based Textbook|last=Diekema|first=Douglas S.|last2=Mercurio|first2=Mark R.|last3=Adam|first3=Mary B.|date=2011-09-08|publisher=Cambridge University Press|isbn=9781139501835|location=|pages=43–48|language=en}}</ref><ref name="knmg.artsennet.nl2">[http://knmg.artsennet.nl/web/file?uuid=579e836d-ea83-410f-9889-feb7eda87cd5&owner=a8a9ce0e-f42b-47a5-960e-be08025b7b04&contentid=77976&elementid=771754 Non-Therapeutic Circumcision of Male Minors]. Utrecht: Royal Dutch Medical Association, 2010.</ref>
{{SEEALSO}}
==References=={{LINKS}}
* {{cite journal |last=Freeman |first=M.D. |authorlink= |date=January 1999 |title=A child's right to circumcision |journal=BJU Int |volume=83 |issue=Suppl. 1 |pages=74–78 |pmid=10349417 |quote= |doi=10.1046/j.1464-410x.1999.0830s1074.x}}
* {{cite journal | author= Goodman J | title=Jewish circumcision: an alternative perspective | journal=BJU Int | date=1999 | volume=83 Suppl. 1 | issue= | pages=22–27 | doi=10.1046/j.1464-410x.1999.0830s1022.x | pmid=10349411 | pmc= }}
==Notes=={{ReflistREF}} {{Circumcision series}} ==External links==
15,551
edits

Navigation menu