Difference between revisions of "Female circumcision in America"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m (using Template:McDonald1958) |
m (using Template:Dawson1915) |
||
| Line 40: | Line 40: | ||
|accessdate= | |accessdate= | ||
}} | }} | ||
| − | * {{ | + | * {{Dawson1915}} |
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | }} | ||
* {{REFjournal | * {{REFjournal | ||
|last=Eskridge | |last=Eskridge | ||
Revision as of 13:50, 19 October 2021
America has a long and dark history regarding both male and female circumcision. This 2 part video series will cover the history of female circumcision in America.
References
Morris RT. Is evolution trying to do away with the clitoris?. American Association of OB/GYNs. 1892; 4- McFarland TS. Circumcision of Girls. Journal of Orificial Surgery. July 1898; 7: 32-33.
- Dawson BE. Circumcision in the Female: Its Necessity and How to Perform It. American Journal of Clinical Medicine. June 1915; 22(66): 520-3. Retrieved 19 October 2021.
- Eskridge BC. Why not circumcise the girl as well as the boy?. Texas State Journal of Medicine. May 1918; 14: 17-19.
- McDonald CF. Circumcision of the female. GP. September 1958; 18(3): 98-9. PMID. Retrieved 13 October 2021.
- Rathmann WG. Female Circumcision: Indications and a New Technique. General Practitioner. September 1959; 20(9): 115-20. PMID. Retrieved 11 October 2021.
