Difference between revisions of "Glandular adhesion (of remnant foreskin)"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m (formattings) |
WikiModEn2 (talk | contribs) (Wikify.) |
||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 84: | Line 84: | ||
}}</ref> | }}</ref> | ||
| − | Ekenze & Ezomike (2013) treated these cases by release of glanular adhesion, excision of the redundant prepuce and refashioning to achieve good cosmesis.<ref name="ekenze2013" /> | + | Ekenze & Ezomike (2013) treated these cases by release of glanular adhesion, excision of the redundant [[prepuce]] and refashioning to achieve good cosmesis.<ref name="ekenze2013" /> |
{{REF}} | {{REF}} | ||
| Line 91: | Line 91: | ||
[[Category:Circumcision risk]] | [[Category:Circumcision risk]] | ||
[[Category:Circumcision in Africa]] | [[Category:Circumcision in Africa]] | ||
| + | |||
| + | [[de:Drüsenadhäsion (der Restvorhaut)]] | ||
Latest revision as of 22:42, 15 May 2023
Glandular adhesion (of remnant foreskin) is a complication of circumcision that occurs primarily when child circumcision is performed by traditional practitioners in developing nations.[1] [2][3]
Ekenze & Ezomike (2013) treated these cases by release of glanular adhesion, excision of the redundant prepuce and refashioning to achieve good cosmesis.[3]
References
- ↑
Osifo OD, Oriaifo IA. Circumcision mishaps in Nigerian children. Ann Afr Med. October 2009; 8(4): 266-70. PMID. DOI. Retrieved 21 February 2022.
Example
- ↑ Tempark T, Wu T, Singer C. Dermatological complications of circumcision: lesson learned from cases in a pediatric dermatology practice. Pediatr Dermatol. 20 May 2013; 30(5): 519-28. PMID. DOI. Retrieved 21 January 2022.
- ↑ a b Ekenze SO, Ezomike UO. Complications of Neonatal Circumcision Requiring Surgical Intervention in a Developing Country (archive URL) August 2013; 59(4): 292-7. PMID. DOI. Retrieved 21 February 2022.
