Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search

History of circumcision

717 bytes removed, 14:17, 16 October 2019
m
replace <coauthors> parameter
}}</ref>
<ref name="Moses1871">{{REFjournal
| last=Moses | first=M.J. | coauthors= | title=The value of circumcision as a hygienic and therapeutic measure | journal=New York Medical Journal | date=1871 Nov | volume=14 | issue=4 | pages=368-374 | url= | quote= | pubmedID= | pubmedCID= | DOI= | accessdate=
}}</ref>
<ref name="Kellogg1888">{{REFbook
}}</ref>
<ref name="Hutchinson1891">{{REFjournal
| last=Hutchinson | first=Johnathan | coauthors= | title=On circumcision as preventive of masturbation | journal=Archives of Surgery | date=1891 Jan | volume=2 | issue=7 | pages=267-269 | url= | quote= | pubmedID= | pubmedCID= | DOI= | accessdate=
}}</ref>
<ref name="Remondino1894">{{REFjournal
| last=Remondino | first=P.C. | coauthors= | title=Negro rapes and their social problems | journal=National Popular Review | date=1894 Jan | volume=4 | issue=1 | pages=3-6 | url= | quote= | pubmedID= | pubmedCID= | DOI= | accessdate=
}}</ref>
<ref name="Cockshut1935">{{REFjournal
| last=Cockshut | first=R.W. | coauthors= | title=Circumcision | journal=British Medical Journal | date=1935-10-19 | volume=2 | issue=3902 | pages=764 | url= | quote= | pubmedID= | pubmedCID= | DOI= | accessdate=
}}</ref>
<ref name="Guttmacher1941">{{REFjournal
| last=Guttmacher | first=Allan F. | coauthors= | title=Should the baby be circumcised? | journal=Parents Magazine | date=September 1941 Sep | volume=16 | issue=9 | pages=26,76-78 | url= | quote= | pubmedID= | pubmedCID= | DOI= | accessdate=
}}</ref>
<ref name="MillerSnyder1953">{{REFjournal
| last=Miller | first=R.L. | coauthorsfirst2=D.C. |last2=Snyder | title=Immediate circumcision of the newborn male | journal=American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology | date=Januar 1953 Jan | volume=6 | issue=1 | pages=1-11 | url= | quote= | pubmedID= | pubmedCID= | DOI= | accessdate=
}}</ref>
<ref name="Fishbein1969">{{REFbook
<ref name="Kellogg1888"/>
<ref>{{REFjournal
| last=Morris | first=Robert Tuttle | coauthors= | title=Is evolution trying to do away with the clitoris? | journal=American Association of OB/GYNs | date=1892 | volume=5 | issue= | pages=288-302 | url= | quote= | pubmedID= | pubmedCID= | DOI= | accessdate=
}}</ref>
<ref name="McFarland1898">{{REFjournal
| last=McFarland | first=T. Scott | coauthors= | title=Circumcision of girls | journal=Journal of Orificial Surgery | date=1898 Jul | volume=7 | issue= | pages=31-33 | url= | quote= | pubmedID= | pubmedCID= | DOI= | accessdate=
}}</ref>
<ref name="Dawson1915">{{REFjournal
| last=Dawson | first=Benjamin E. | coauthors= | title=Circumcision in the Female: Its Necessity and How to Perform It | journal=American Journal of Clinical Medicine | date=1915 Jun | volume=22 | issue=66 | pages=520-523 | url= | quote= | pubmedID= | pubmedCID= | DOI= | accessdate=
}}</ref>
<ref name="Eskridge1918">{{REFjournal
| last=Eskridge | first=Belle C. | coauthors= | title=Why not circumcise the girl as well as the boy? | journal=Texas State Journal of Medicine | date=May 1918 May | volume=14 | issue= | pages=17-19 | url= | quote= | pubmedID= | pubmedCID= | DOI= | accessdate=
}}</ref>
<ref name="McDonald1958">{{REFjournal
| last=McDonald | first=C.F. | coauthors= | title=Circumcision of the female | journal=General Practitioner | date=September 1958 Sep | volume=18 | issue=3 | pages=98-99 | url= | quote= | pubmedID= | pubmedCID= | DOI= | accessdate=
}}</ref>
<ref name="Rathmann1959">{{REFjournal
| last= | first= | coauthors= | title=Female Circumcision: Indications and a New Technique | journal=General Practitioner | date=September 1959 Sep | volume=20 | issue=9 | pages=115-120 | url= | quote= | pubmedID= | pubmedCID= | DOI= | accessdate=
}}</ref>
FGC was even covered by Blue Cross Blue Shield until 1977. Nowadays, many forms of FGC are now considered forms of female genital mutilation (FGM), which are banned in all western countries.
* 1855 [[Johnathon Hutchinson]] publishes his theory that circumcision '''prevents syphilis'''.<ref>{{REFjournal
| last=Hutchinson | first=Johnathon | coauthors= | title=On the Influence of Circumcision in Preventing Syphilis | journal=Medical Times and Gazette | date=1855 | volume=32 | issue=844 | pages=542-543 | url= | quote= | pubmedID= | pubmedCID= | DOI= | accessdate=
}}</ref>
* 1865 [[Nathaniel Heckford]] claims that circumcision '''cures epilepsy'''.<ref>{{REFjournal
| last=Heckford | first=Nathaniel | coauthors= | title=Circumcision as a remedial measure in certain cases of epilepsy and chorea | journal=Clinical Lectures and Reports by the Medical and Surgical Staff of the London Hospital | date=1865 | volume=2 | issue= | pages=58-64 | url= | quote= | pubmedID= | pubmedCID= | DOI= | accessdate=
}}</ref>
* 1870 [[Lewis A. Sayre]] publishes a paper 'proving' that circumcision '''cures epilepsy'''.<ref>{{REFjournal
| last=Sayre | first=Lewis A. | coauthors= | title=Circumcision versus epilepsy, etc; Transcription of the New York Pathological Society meeting of June 8, 1870 | journal=Medical Record | date=1870-07-15 | volume=5 | issue=10 | pages=231-234 | url= | quote= | pubmedID= | pubmedCID= | DOI= | accessdate=
}}</ref>
* 1870 [[Lewis A. Sayre]] declares that circumcision '''prevents spinal paralysis'''.<ref>{{REFjournal
| last=Sayre | first=Lewis A. | coauthors= | title=Partial paralysis from reflex irritation, caused by congenital phimosis and adherent prepuce | journal=Transactions of the American Medical Association | date=1870 | volume=21 | issue= | pages=205-211 | url= | quote= | pubmedID= | pubmedCID= | DOI= | accessdate=
}}</ref>
* 1873 [[Joseph Bell]] announces his discovery that circumcision '''cures bed wetting'''.<ref>{{REFjournal
| last=Bell | first=Joseph | coauthors= | title=Nocturnal incontinence of urine cured by circumcision | journal=Edinburgh Medical Journal | date=May 1873 May | volume=1 | issue=9 | pages=1034 | url= | quote= | pubmedID= | pubmedCID= | DOI= | accessdate=
}}</ref>
* 1875 [[Lewis A. Sayre]] declares that '''foreskin causes curvature of the spine, paralysis of the bladder, and clubfoot'''.<ref>{{REFjournal
| last=Sayre | first=Lewis A. | coauthors= | title=Spinal anaemia with partial paralysis and want of coordination, from irritation of the genital organs | journal=Transactions of the American Medical Association | date=1875 | volume=26 | issue= | pages=255-274 | url= | quote= | pubmedID= | pubmedCID= | DOI= | accessdate=
}}</ref>
* 1879 [[H.H. Kane]] 'discovers' that circumcision '''cures nocturnal emissions and abdominal neuralgia'''.<ref>{{REFjournal
| last=Kane | first=H.H. | coauthors= | title=Seminal emissions, abdominal neuralgia: circumcision: cure | journal=Southern Clinic | date=October 1879 Oct | volume=2 | issue=1 | pages=8-11 | url= | quote= | pubmedID= | pubmedCID= | DOI= | accessdate=
}}</ref>
* 1881 [[Maximillian Landesburg]] announces that circumcision '''cures eye problems''' that he believed were '''caused by masturbation'''.<ref>{{REFjournal
| last=Landesburg | first=Maximillian | coauthors= | title=On affections of the eye caused by masturbation | journal=Medical Bulletin | date=Apr 1881 Apr | volume=3 | issue=4 | pages=79-81 | url= | quote= | pubmedID= | pubmedCID= | DOI= | accessdate=
}}</ref>
* 1886 [[William G. Eggleston]] declares that '''foreskin causes crossed eyes'''.<ref>{{REFjournal
| last=Eggleston | first=William G. | coauthors= | title=Two cases of reflex paraplegia(one with aphasia) from tape-worm and phimosis | journal=Journal of the American Medical Association | date=1886-05-08 | volume=6 | issue=19 | pages=511-515 | url= | quote= | pubmedID= | pubmedCID= | DOI= | accessdate=
}}</ref>
* 1890 [[William D. Gentry]] declares that circumcision cures blindness, deafness and dumbness.<ref>{{REFjournal
| last=Gentry | first=William D. | coauthors= | title=Nervous derangements produced by sexual irregularities in boys | journal=Medical Current | date=Jul 1890 Jul | volume=6 | issue=7 | pages=268-274 | url= | quote= | pubmedID= | pubmedCID= | DOI= | accessdate=
}}</ref>
* 1893 [[Mark J. Lehman]] demands immediate implementation of mass circumcision of all American boys.<ref>{{REFjournal
| last=Lehman | first=Mark J. | coauthors= | title=A plea for circumcision | journal=Medical Review | date=1893-07-22 | volume=28 | issue=4 | pages=65-65 | url= | quote= | pubmedID= | pubmedCID= | DOI= | accessdate=
}}</ref>
* 1894 [[H.L. Rosenberry]] publishes paper 'proving' that circumcision '''cures urinary and rectal incontinence'''.<ref>{{REFjournal
| last=Rosenberry | first=H.L. | coauthors= | title=Incontinence of the urine and faeces, cured by circumcision | journal=Medical Record | date=1894-08-11 | volume=4 | issue=6 | pages=173 | url= | quote= | pubmedID= | pubmedCID= | DOI= | accessdate=
}}</ref>
* 1900 [[Johnathan Hutchinson]] advises circumcision as way to '''decrease the pleasure of sex''', and hence to '''discourage sexual immorality'''.<ref>{{REFjournal
| last=Hutchinson | first=Johnathan | coauthors= | title=The advantages of circumcision | journal=The Polyclinic | date=Sep 1900 Sep | volume=3 | issue=9 | pages=129-131 | url= | quote= | pubmedID= | pubmedCID= | DOI= | accessdate=
}}</ref>
* 1901 [[Ernest G. Mark]] notes that the "pleasurable sensations that are elicited from the extremely sensitive" inner lining of the foreskin may encourage a child to masturbate, which is why he recommends circumcision since it "lessens the sensitiveness of the organ". <ref>{{REFjournal
| last=Mark | first=Ernest G. | coauthors= | title=Circumcision | journal=American Practitioner and News | date=1901-02-15 | volume=31 | issue=4 | pages=122-126 | url= | quote= | pubmedID= | pubmedCID= | DOI= | accessdate=
}}</ref>
* 1902 [[Roswell Park]] publishes paper 'proving' that '''foreskin causes epilepsy''' and that circumcision cures it.<ref>{{REFjournal
| last=Park | first=Roswell | coauthors= | title=The surgical treatment of epilepsy | journal=American Medicine | date=1902-11-22 | volume=4 | issue=21 | pages=807-809 | url= | quote= | pubmedID= | pubmedCID= | DOI= | accessdate=
}}</ref>
* 1914 [[Abraham L. Wolbarst]] claims that circumcision '''prevents tuberculosis''' and demands the compulsory circumcision of all children in America.<ref>{{REFjournal
| last=Wolbarst | first=Abraham L. | coauthors= | title=Universal circumcision as a sanitary measure | journal=Journal of the American Medical Association | date=1914-01-10 | volume=62 | issue=2 | pages=92-97 | url= | quote= | pubmedID= | pubmedCID= | DOI= | accessdate=
}}</ref>
* 1926 [[Abraham L. Wolbarst]] claims that circumcision '''prevents penile cancer'''.<ref>{{REFjournal
| last=Wolbarst | first=Abraham L. | coauthors= | title=Is circumcision a prophylactic against penis cancer? | journal=Cancer | date=Jul 1926 Jul | volume=3 | issue=4 | pages=301-310 | url= | quote= | pubmedID= | pubmedCID= | DOI= | accessdate=
}}</ref>
* 1930 [[Norton Henry Bare]] claims that he has cured a boy of '''epilepsy''' by circumcising him.<ref>{{REFjournal
| last=Bare | first=Norton Henry | coauthors= | title=Surgical treatment of epilepsy with report of case | journal=The China Medical Journal | date=Nov 1930 Nov | volume=4 | issue=11 | pages=1109-1113 | url= | quote= | pubmedID= | pubmedCID= | DOI= | accessdate=
}}</ref>
[[File:Single_mogen.jpg|right|thumb|The [[Gomco|Gomco]] and [[Mogen|Mogen]] clamps.]]
* 1934 [[Aaron Goldstein]] and [[Hiram S. Yellen]] invent and mass market the [[Gomco]] clamp which makes it easier for doctors to cut off even more skin than in traditional circumcisions.<ref>{{REFjournal
| last=Goldstein | first=Aaron | coauthorsfirst2=Hiram S. |last2=Yellen | title=Bloodless circumcision of the newborn | journal=American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology | date=July 1935 | volume=30 | issue=1 | pages=146-147 | url= | quote= | pubmedID= | pubmedCID= | DOI= | accessdate=
}}</ref>
* 1942 [[Abraham Ravich]] claims that circumcision prevents '''prostate cancer'''.<ref>{{REFjournal
| last=Ravich | first=Abraham | coauthorsauthor-link=Abraham Ravich | title=The relationship of circumcision to cancer of the prostate | journal=Journal of Urology | date=Sep 1942 Sep | volume=48 | issue=3 | pages=298-299 | url= | quote= | pubmedID= | pubmedCID= | DOI= | accessdate=
}}</ref>
* 1949 [[Eugene H. Hand]] declares that circumcision '''prevents venereal disease and cancer of the tongue'''.<ref>{{REFjournal
| last=Hand | first=Eugene H. | coauthorsauthor-link=Eugene H. Hand | title=Circumcision and venereal disease | journal=Archives of Dermatology and Syphilology | date=1949 Sep | volume=60 | issue=3 | pages=341-346 | url= | quote= | pubmedID= | pubmedCID= | DOI= | accessdate=
}}</ref>
* 1949 [[Douglas Gairdner]] points out that the previous years cases of infant '''circumcision deaths were not necessary given the lack of medical justification for circumcision'''.<br>(Note: This paper helped encourage the National Health Service to drop coverage for infant circumcision which led to the practical elimination of non- religious circumcision in the United Kingdom.)<ref>{{REFjournal
| last=Gairdner | first=Douglas | coauthorsauthor-link=Douglas Gairdner | title=The fate of the foreskin | journal=British Medical Journal | date=1949 | volume=2 | issue= | pages=1433-1437 | url=https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2051968/pdf/brmedj03656-0009.pdf | quote= | pubmedID= | pubmedCID= | DOI= | accessdate=
}}</ref>
* 1951 [[Abraham Ravich]] invents claims that circumcision prevents '''cervical cancer in women'''.<ref>{{REFjournal
| last=Ravich | first=Abraham | coauthorsauthor-link=Abraham Ravich | title=Prophylaxis of cancer of the prostate, penis, and cervix by circumcision | journal=New York State Journal of Medicine | date=1951 Jun | volume=51 | issue=12 | pages=1519-1520 | url= | quote= | pubmedID= | pubmedCID= | DOI= | accessdate=
}}</ref>
* 1954 [[Ernest L. Wynder]] claims that male circumcision '''prevents cervical cancer in women.'''<ref>{{REFjournal
| last=Wynder | first=Ernest L. | coauthorsauthor-link=Ernest L. Wynder | title=A study of environmental factors of carcinoma of the cervix | journal=American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology | date=1954 Oct | volume=68 | issue=4 | pages=10166-52 | url= | quote= | pubmedID= | pubmedCID= | DOI= | accessdate=
}}</ref>
* 1971 [[Abraham Ravich]] claims that circumcision prevents cancer of the bladder and the rectum.<ref>{{REFjournal
| last=Ravich | first=Abraham | coauthorsauthor-link=Abraham Ravich | title=Viral carcinogenesis in venereally susceptible organs | journal=Cancer | date=1971 Jun | volume=27 | issue=6 | pages=1493-1496 | url= | quote= | pubmedID= | pubmedCID= | DOI= | accessdate=
}}</ref>
* 1973 [[R. Dagher]], [[Melvin Selzer]], and [[Jack Lapides]] declare that anyone who disagrees with their agenda to impose mass circumcision on America is deluded.<ref>{{REFjournal
| last=Dagher |first=R. |author-link=R. Dagher, |first2=Melvin |last2=Selzer, and |author2-link=Melvin Selzer |first3=Jack Lapides | firstlast3=Lapides | coauthorsauthor3-link=Jack Lapides | title=Carcinoma of the penis and the anti-circumcision crusade | journal=Journal of Urology | date=1973 Jul | volume=110 | issue=1 | pages=79-80 | url= | quote= | pubmedID= | pubmedCID= | DOI= | accessdate=
}}</ref>
* 1975 The [[American Academy of Pediatrics]] Task force on Circumcision declares, "There are no medical indications for routine circumcisions and the procedure cannot be considered an essential component of health care."<ref>{{REFjournal
| last=American Academy of Pediatrics | first= | coauthors= | title=Report on the ad hoc task force on circumcision | journal=Pediatrics | date=1975 | volume=56 | issue= | pages=610-611 | url= | quote= | pubmedID= | pubmedCID= | DOI= | accessdate=
}}</ref>
* 1985 [[Thomas E. Wiswell]] claims that circumcision prevents urinary tract infections.<ref>{{REFjournal
| last=Wiswell | first=Thomas E. | coauthorsauthor-link=Thomas E. Wiswell | title=Decreased incidence of urinary tract infections in circumcised male infants | journal=Pediatrics | date=1985 May | volume=75 | issue=5 | pages=901-903 | url= | quote= | pubmedID= | pubmedCID= | DOI= | accessdate=
}}</ref>
* 1986 [[Aaron J. Fink]] claims that circumcision '''prevents AIDS'''.<ref>{{REFjournal
| last=Fink | first=Aaron J. | coauthorsauthor-link=Aaron J. Fink | title=A possible explanation for heterosexual male infection with AIDS | journal=New England Journal of Medicine | date=1986-10-30 | volume=31 | issue=18 | pages=1167 | url= | quote= | pubmedID= | pubmedCID= | DOI= | accessdate=
}}</ref>
* 1988 [[Aaron J. Fink]] invents the falsehood that circumcision '''prevents neonatal group B streptococcal disease'''.<ref>{{REFjournal
| last=Fink | first=Aaron J. | coauthorsauthor-link=Aaron J. Fink | title=Is hygiene enough? Circumcision as a possible strategy to prevent group B streptococcal disease | journal=American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology | date=1988 Aug | volume=159 | issue=2 | pages=534-535 | url= | quote= | pubmedID= | pubmedCID= | DOI= | accessdate=
}}</ref>
* 1989 Under the direction of [[Edgar J. Schoen]], the [[American Academy of Pediatrics]] Task Force on Circumcision declares circumcision is necessary.<ref>{{REFjournal
| last=Schoen | first=Edgar J. | coauthorsauthor-link=Edgar J. Schoen | title=Report of the Task Force on Circumcision | journal=Pediatrics | date=1989 Aug | volume=84 | issue=2 | pages=388-391 | url= | quote= | pubmedID= | pubmedCID= | DOI= | accessdate=
}}</ref>
* 1991 [[Edgar J. Schoen]] tries and fails to convince European countries to institute mass circumcision.<ref>{{REFjournal
| last=Schoen | first=Edgar J. | coauthorsauthor-link=Edgar J. Schoen | title=Is it time for Europe to reconsider newborn circumcision? | journal=Acta Paediatrica Scandanavian | date=1991 May | volume=8 | issue=5 | pages=573-577 | url= | quote= | pubmedID= | pubmedCID= | DOI= | accessdate=
}}</ref>
* 1991 [[Aaron J. Fink]] declares mass circumcision is necessary to '''prevent sand from getting into the soldiers' foreskins'''.<ref>{{REFjournal
| last=Fink | first=Aaron J. | coauthorsauthor-link=Aaron J. Fink | title=Circumcision and sand | journal=Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine | date=1991 Nov | volume=84 | issue=11 | pages=696 | url= | quote= | pubmedID= | pubmedCID= | DOI= | accessdate=
}}</ref>
* 1996 [[J.R. Taylor]] finds that the average amount of amputated foreskin was nearly half of the total penile skin.<ref>{{REFjournal
| last=Taylor | first=J.R. | coauthorsauthor-link=John R. Taylor |last2=Lockwood AP, |first2=A.P. |last3=Taylor AJ |first3=A.J. | title=The prepuce: Specialized mucosa of the penis and its loss to circumcision | journal=British Journal of Urology | date=1996 Feb | volume=77 | issue= | pages=291-295 | url=http://www.cirp.org/library/anatomy/taylor/ | quote= | pubmedID= | pubmedCID= | DOI= | accessdate=
}}</ref>
* 1997 [[Edgar J. Schoen]] tries and fails once again to convince European countries to institute mass circumcision.<ref>{{REFjournal
| last=Schoen | first=Edgar J. | coauthorsauthor-link=Edgar J. Schoen | title=Benefits of newborn circumcision: Is Europe ignoring the medical evidence? | journal=Archives of Diseases of Childhood | date=1997 Sep | volume=7 | issue=33 | pages=258-260 | url= | quote= | pubmedID= | pubmedCID= | DOI= | accessdate=
}}</ref>
* 1997 [[Janice Lander]] discovers that '''circumcision without anesthesia is traumatic for babies'''.<br>(Note: Before this, almost all infant circumcisions were done without anesthetic due to the prevalent belief among circumcisers that babies are not capable of feeling significant pain and if they could it doesn't matter since they won't be able to remember it.)<ref>{{REFjournal
| last=Lander | first=Janice | coauthorsauthor-link=Janice Lander | title=Comparison of ring block, dorsal penile nerve block, and topical anesthesia for neonatal circumcision | journal=Journal of the American Medical Association | date=1997 Dec | volume=274 | issue=24 | pages=2157-2162 | url=http://www.cirp.org/library/pain/lander/ | quote= | pubmedID= | pubmedCID= | DOI= | accessdate=
}}</ref>
* 1998 [[Howard J. Stang]], inventor of an upright circumcision restraint fails to mention this conflict of interest in his article promoting infant circumcision.<ref>{{REFjournal
| last=Stang | first=Howard J. | coauthorsauthor-link=Howard J. Stang | title=Patent #5,160,185, Infant support and restraint system 1992, Circumcision Practice Patterns in the United States | journal=Pediatrics | date=1998 Jun | volume=101 | issue=6 | pages=E5 | url= | quote= | pubmedID= | pubmedCID= | DOI= | accessdate=
}}</ref>
* 1999 [[J.John R. Taylor]], after studying the foreskin's specialized innervation, concludes that it is the "primary erogenous tissue necessary for normal sexual function."<ref>{{REFjournal | last=Taylor | first=J.R. | coauthorsauthor-link=John R. Taylor | title=The prepuce | journal=BJU Int | date=1999 Jan | volume=83 | issue=1 | pages=34-44 | url=http://www.cirp.org/library/anatomy/cold-taylor/ | quote= | pubmedID= | pubmedCID= | DOI= | accessdate=
}}</ref>
::'''Urinary Tract Infections:''' "breastfeeding was shown to have a threefold protective effect on the incidence of UTI in a sample of uncircumcised infants. However, breastfeeding status has not been evaluated systematically in studies assessing UTI and circumcision status." meaning that the earlier UTIs studies results were confounded. Even if their numbers were accurate, in order to prevent one UTI during the first year of life by circumcising a baby boy, approximately 195 babies who will not get a UTI would need to be circumcised. Also infant girls commonly develop UTIs(in some studies at even higher rates than infant boys) and the standard treatment for them is antibiotics which works just as well for infant boys with UTIs. The AAP concludes this section noting that "the absolute risk of developing a UTI in an uncircumcised male infant is low (at most, ~1%)".
::'''Ethics:''' Here they say while even though cutting off part of your baby's genitalia "is not essential to the child's current well-being" they are perfectly fine with parents and doctors using cultural tradition as justification.<br>(Note: The report does not mention whether they also think cultural tradition is an acceptable reason to anesthetize infant girls and then cut off their clitoral hoods(which are biologically analogous to foreskin)).<ref>{{REFjournal
| last=American Academy of Pediatrics | first= | coauthors= | title=Task Force on Circumcision. Circumcision Policy Statement | journal=Pediatrics | date=1999 | volume=103 | issue=3 | pages=686-693 | url= | quote= | pubmedID= | pubmedCID= | DOI= | accessdate=
}}</ref>
* 2002 [[W.K. Nahm]] extends the storage life of specialized cell cultures derived from "freshly harvested neonatal foreskin tissue."<br>(Note: Since the 1980s, some amputated infant foreskins have been sold without the knowledge of the parents to biomedical companies for research and even use in commercial cosmetic products such as anti-wrinkle creams.)<ref>{{REFjournal
| last=Nahm | first=W.K. | coauthors= | title=Sustained ability for fibroblast outgrowth from stored neonatal foreskin | journal=Journal of Dermatology Science | date=2002 Feb | volume=28 | issue=2 | pages=152-158 | url= | quote= | pubmedID= | pubmedCID= | DOI= | accessdate=
}}</ref>
* 2003 [[Edgar J. Schoen]] steps up pressure on [[American Academy of Pediatrics]] to reverse its policy on circumcision, claiming that circumcision prevents AIDS.<ref>{{REFjournal
| last=Schoen | first=Edgar J. | coauthorsauthor-link=Edgar J. Schoen | title=It's wise to circumcise: time to change policy | journal=Pediatrics | date=2003 Jun | volume=111 | issue=6 Pt 1 | pages=1490-1491 | url= | quote= | pubmedID= | pubmedCID= | DOI= | accessdate=
}}</ref>
* 2007 [[Robert C. Bailey]] ends his study early with the conclusion '''touting circumcision as a 'vaccine' that prevents HIV infection'''.<br>(Note: This and other similar studies were widely reported throughout the American media.)<ref>{{REFjournal
| last=Bailey | first=Robert C. | coauthorsauthor-link=Robert C. Bailey | title=Male circumcision for HIV prevention for young men in Kisumu, Kenya | journal=Lancet | date=2007 | volume=369 | issue=9562 | pages=643-656 | url= | quote= | pubmedID= | pubmedCID= | DOI= | accessdate=
}}</ref>
* 2007 [[L. de Witte]] finds that '''Langerhans cells found in the foreskin are a natural barrier to HIV infection'''.<br>(Note: This and other similar studies were widely ignored throughout the American media.)<ref>{{REFjournal
| last=de Witte | first=L. | coauthorsauthor-link=L. de Witte | title=Langerin is a natural barrier to HIV-1 transmission by Langerhans cells | journal=Nature Medicine | volume= | issue=13 | pages=367-371 | url=http://icgi.org/Downloads/IAS/de_Witte.pd | quote= | pubmedID= | pubmedCID= | DOI= | date=2007 | accessdate=2019-09-24 September 2019
}}</ref>
* 2007 [[Morris L. Sorrells]] ''et al.'' tests the relative sensitivity of the penis and finds that the '''foreskin is the most sensitive part of the penis and the glans is the least'''.<ref>{{REFjournal
| last=Sorrells | first=Morris L. | coauthorsauthor-link=Morris L. Sorrells | title=Fine touch pressure thresholds in the adult penis | journal=British Journal of Urology International | volume=99 | issue= | pages=864-9 | url=http://www.nocirc.org/touch-test/bju_6685.pdf | quote= | pubmedID= | pubmedCID= | DOI= | date=2007 | accessdate=2019-09-24
}}</ref>
administrator, administrators, Bureaucrats, Interface administrators, Administrators
22,208
edits

Navigation menu