Difference between revisions of "Intraperitoneal bladder perforation"

From IntactiWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Create page.)
 
(Add text and citation.)
Line 32: Line 32:
 
  |quote=
 
  |quote=
 
  |pubmedID=26657690
 
  |pubmedID=26657690
  |pubmedCID=
+
  |pubmedCID=6369329
 
  |DOI=10.1016/j.urology.2015.11.022  
 
  |DOI=10.1016/j.urology.2015.11.022  
 
  |accessdate=2022-01-18
 
  |accessdate=2022-01-18
 +
}}</ref>
 +
 +
The seventy-year-old Plastibell device has a long history of migrating from its intended position where it may cause blockage of urination and other issues.<ref>{{REFweb
 +
|url=http://www.drmomma.org/2010/05/the-perils-of-plastibell-circumcision.html
 +
|archived=
 +
|title=The Perils of Plastibell Circumcision: A Mythical "No Cutting, No Risk" Method
 +
|trans-title=
 +
|language=
 +
|last=Day
 +
|first=Danielle
 +
|author-link=
 +
|publisher=Peaceful Parenting
 +
|website=
 +
|date=2010
 +
|accessdate=2022-02-18
 +
|format=
 +
|quote=
 
}}</ref>
 
}}</ref>
 
{{REF}}
 
{{REF}}
  
 
[[Category:Circumcision complication]]
 
[[Category:Circumcision complication]]

Revision as of 02:06, 19 February 2022

Intraperitoneal bladder perforation is an iatrogenic complication of using the Plastibell device to perform a medically-unnecessary, non-therapeutic circumcision of an infant boy.[1]

The seventy-year-old Plastibell device has a long history of migrating from its intended position where it may cause blockage of urination and other issues.[2]

References

  1. REFjournal Dwyer, Moira, Peffer, Nathan, Fuller, Thamas, Cannon, Glenn. Intraperitoneal Bladder Perforation and Life-threatening Renal Failure in a Neonate Following Circumcision With the Plastibell Device. Urology. March 2016; 89: 134-6. PMID. PMC. DOI. Retrieved 18 January 2022.
  2. REFweb Day, Danielle (2010). The Perils of Plastibell Circumcision: A Mythical "No Cutting, No Risk" Method, Peaceful Parenting. Retrieved 18 February 2022.