Difference between revisions of "Intraperitoneal bladder perforation"

From IntactiWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Add text and citation.)
(Delete erroneous URL.)
Line 28: Line 28:
 
  |page=
 
  |page=
 
  |pages=134-6
 
  |pages=134-6
  |url=https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0090429515010857
+
  |url=
 
  |archived=
 
  |archived=
 
  |quote=
 
  |quote=

Revision as of 02:15, 19 February 2022

Intraperitoneal bladder perforation is an iatrogenic complication of using the Plastibell device to perform a medically-unnecessary, non-therapeutic circumcision of an infant boy.[1]

The seventy-year-old Plastibell device has a long history of migrating from its intended position where it may cause blockage of urination and other issues.[2]

References

  1. REFjournal Dwyer, Moira, Peffer, Nathan, Fuller, Thamas, Cannon, Glenn. Intraperitoneal Bladder Perforation and Life-threatening Renal Failure in a Neonate Following Circumcision With the Plastibell Device. Urology. March 2016; 89: 134-6. PMID. PMC. DOI. Retrieved 18 January 2022.
  2. REFweb Day, Danielle (2010). The Perils of Plastibell Circumcision: A Mythical "No Cutting, No Risk" Method, Peaceful Parenting. Retrieved 18 February 2022.