Difference between revisions of "Intraperitoneal bladder perforation"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
WikiModEn2 (talk | contribs) (Delete erroneous URL.) |
WikiModEn2 (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | '''Intraperitoneal bladder perforation''' is an [[iatrogenic]] complication of using the [[Plastibell]] device to perform a medically-unnecessary, non-therapeutic [[circumcision]] of an infant boy.<ref>{{REFjournal | + | '''Intraperitoneal bladder perforation''' is an [[iatrogenic]] complication of using the [[Plastibell]] device to perform a medically-unnecessary, non-therapeutic [[circumcision]] of an infant boy.<ref name="dwyer2016">{{REFjournal |
|last=Dwyer | |last=Dwyer | ||
|first=Moira | |first=Moira | ||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
|author2-link= | |author2-link= | ||
|last3=Fuller | |last3=Fuller | ||
| − | |first3= | + | |first3=Thomas |
|init3= | |init3= | ||
|author3-link= | |author3-link= | ||
| Line 53: | Line 53: | ||
|quote= | |quote= | ||
}}</ref> | }}</ref> | ||
| − | {{REF}} | + | There is a history of Plastibell migration causing [[death]],<ref name="coroner2007">{{REFjournal |
| − | + | |last=Coroner | |
| + | |first=Chief | ||
| + | |init= | ||
| + | |author-link= | ||
| + | |etal=no | ||
| + | |title=Circumcision: A minor procedure? | ||
| + | |trans-title= | ||
| + | |language= | ||
| + | |journal=Paediatr Child Health | ||
| + | |location= | ||
| + | |date=2007-04 | ||
| + | |volume=12 | ||
| + | |issue=4 | ||
| + | |article= | ||
| + | |page= | ||
| + | |pages=311-2 | ||
| + | |url= | ||
| + | |archived= | ||
| + | |quote= | ||
| + | |pubmedID=19030377 | ||
| + | |pubmedCID=2528673 | ||
| + | |DOI= | ||
| + | |accessdate=2022-02-18 | ||
| + | }}</ref> so there is a very substantial question of the medical judgment concerning any physician who performs a non-beneficial, medically-unnecessary, non-therapeutic circumcision with a Plastibell device. | ||
| + | {{REF}} | ||
[[Category:Circumcision complication]] | [[Category:Circumcision complication]] | ||
Revision as of 03:20, 19 February 2022
Intraperitoneal bladder perforation is an iatrogenic complication of using the Plastibell device to perform a medically-unnecessary, non-therapeutic circumcision of an infant boy.[1]
The seventy-year-old Plastibell device has a long history of migrating from its intended position where it may cause blockage of urination and other issues.[2] There is a history of Plastibell migration causing death,[3] so there is a very substantial question of the medical judgment concerning any physician who performs a non-beneficial, medically-unnecessary, non-therapeutic circumcision with a Plastibell device.
References
- ↑
Dwyer, Moira, Peffer, Nathan, Fuller, Thomas, Cannon, Glenn. Intraperitoneal Bladder Perforation and Life-threatening Renal Failure in a Neonate Following Circumcision With the Plastibell Device. Urology. March 2016; 89: 134-6. PMID. PMC. DOI. Retrieved 18 January 2022.
- ↑
Day, Danielle (2010). The Perils of Plastibell Circumcision: A Mythical "No Cutting, No Risk" Method
, Peaceful Parenting. Retrieved 18 February 2022. - ↑ Coroner, Chief. Circumcision: A minor procedure?. Paediatr Child Health. April 2007; 12(4): 311-2. PMID. PMC. Retrieved 18 February 2022.
