Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search

Mogen

209 bytes removed, 02:53, 3 December 2023
Add link in SEEALSO section.
|date=2011-04-08
|accessdate=2011-04-08
}}</ref> The Mogen clamp's name derives from the Hebrew word "magain," or shield, and it was invented in an effort to standardize [[circumcision]] equipment then in use by both doctors and mohels ''mohelim'' without medical training who perform the procedure in private homes and other locations.<ref name="hennessy-fiske2011" /> The device is designed to "shield" the [[glans]], as the name implies, while the [[mohel]] slices off the [[foreskin]].<ref name="kaweblum1984">{{REFjournal
|last=Kaweblum
|first=Yosef
|DOI=10.1177/000992288402301204
|accessdate=2020-08-06
}}</ref> A user must first rip the [[foreskin]] from the [[glans]], then pull it through the clamp and slices it off with a single motion.<ref name="hennessy-fiske2011" /> Some orthodox Jews only recognize circumcisions performed with devices based on the traditional design,<ref name="hennessy-fiske2011" /> and for this reason it is preferred by traditional [[mohel| mohelim]]s.<ref name="hennessy-fiske2011" />
== Injury reports ==
|publisher=
|website=Law.com
|quote=She noted an instructional brochure accompanying the Mogel Mogen clamp stating that "no injury to glans is possible," even though other [[amputation]]s had been reported.
|date=2010-07-29
|accessdate=2011-04-08
== Mogen goes out of business ==
Mogen went out of business in July of 2010<ref name="tagami2010" /> after losing a 10.8 million dollar law suit,<ref name="tagami2010" /> after a [[mohel]]<ref name="tagami2010" /> severed the end of a baby's glans<ref name="tagami2010" /> using one of their clamps. Mogen claimed that injury was impossible with its use.<ref name="tagami2010" /><ref name='Law.com 2010-07-29'>{{REFnews |last=Hayes Tucker |first=Katheryn |url=http://www.law.com/jsp/article.jsp?id=1202464033969&Atlanta_Lawyer_Takes_on_Botched_Circumcision_Claims_Nationwide&slreturn=1&hbxlogin=1 |title=Atlanta Lawyer Takes on Botched Circumcision Claims Nationwide |publisher= |website=Law.com |quote=She noted an instructional brochure accompanying the Mogel clamp stating that "no injury to glans is possible," even though other [[amputation]]s had been reported. |date=2010-07-29 |accessdate=2011-04-08}}</ref> The injury behind a prior lawsuit in Fulton County Superior Court had already put Mogen on notice about the danger of the device,<ref name="tagami2010" /> and they were already in default on a $7.5-million judgment in Massachusetts.<ref name="hennessy-fiske2011" />
In a different case, at South Fulton Medical Center, another law suit was won in 2009.<ref name="tagami2010" /> In that case, a child lost a third of his glans, and the plaintifs were awarded 2.3 million dollars.<ref name="tagami2010" />
|accessdate=2020-03-09
}}</ref>
== Video ==
* {{REFweb
|url=https://med.stanford.edu/newborns/professional-education/circumcision/mogen-clamp-technique.html
|title=Mogen Clamp Technique
|last=Duterte
|first=Brendan
|init=
|publisher=Stanford School of Medicine
|date=2023
|accessdate=2023-12-02
}}
{{SEEALSO}}
* [[Pain]]
* [[Trauma]]
{{REF}}
15,498
edits

Navigation menu