22,208
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Pain
,wikify EMLA
# Finally, in another, painful step, the foreskin must be cut away.
Lander et al. (1997) conducted a comparison neonatal non-therapeutic circumcision without anesthesia (current practice in 1997), ring block, dorsal penile nerve block, and a topical eutectic mixture of local anesthetics ([[EMLA]]).<ref name="lander1997">{{REFjournal
|last=Lander
|init=J
With no anesthesia, the infants screamed continuously. Newborns in the untreated placebo group exhibited homogeneous responses that consisted of sustained elevation of heart rate and high pitched cry throughout the circumcision and following. Two newborns in the placebo group became ill following circumcision (choking and apnea). One experienced projectile vomiting.<ref name="lander1997" />
[[EMLA ]] was the least effective pain control. Dorsal penile nerve block (DPNB) was more effective, and ring block was the most effective. The authors reported "[w]ithout exception, newborns in this study who did not receive an analgesic suffered great distress during and following the circumcision, and they were exposed to unnecessary risk (from choking or apnea)." The authors were so alarmed that they terminated the no anesthesia arm of the study early.<ref name="lander1997" />
None of the analgesic measures tested provided total pain relief.<ref name="bellieni2013">{{REFjournal
|last=Bellieni
Three methods were proposed:
* Application of [[EMLA ]] Cream topical anesthetic. [[EMLA ]] is a eutectic mixture of lidocaine 2.5% and prilocaine 2.5%. [[EMLA ]] Cream (lidocaine 2.5% and prilocaine 2.5%), applied to intact [[skin]] under occlusive dressing, provides dermal analgesia by the release of lidocaine and prilocaine from the cream into the epidermal and dermal layers of the [[skin]] and by the accumulation of lidocaine and prilocaine in the vicinity of dermal pain receptors and nerve endings.<ref>{{REFweb
|url=https://www.drugs.com/pro/emla.html#s-34069-5
|archived=