22,208
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m
• * [[American Congress of Obstetricians and Gynecologists| American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologist]]s (ACOG) • * [[American Academy of Family Physicians]] (AAFP) • * [[American Academy of Pediatrics]]. (AAP)
|trans-title=
|language=English
|trans-title=
|language=English
|trans-title=
|language=
|trans-title=
|language=English
adjusted REFjournal
The three trade associations, whose member profit by carrying out non-therapeutic circumcision of boys formed a pact in 2007 to create a circumcision statement that would protect [[third-party payment]] for non-therapeutic circumcision. The three trade associations are:
===American Academy of Pediatrics===
|etal=no
|title=Circumcision Policy Statement
|journal=Pediatrics
|location=
|etal=no
|title=Male circumcision
|journal=Pediatrics
|location=
}}</ref> an association of European doctors,<ref>{{REFjournal
|last=Frisch
|firstinit=M
|author-link=Morten Frisch
|last2=Aigrain
|first2=Yves
|init2=Y
|author2-link=
|last3=Barauskas
|first3=Vidmantas
|init3=V
|author3-link=
|last4=Bjarnason,
|first4=Ragnar
|init4=R
|author4-link=
|last5=Boddy
|first5=Su-Anna
|init5=SA
|author5-link=
|last6=Czauderna
|first6=Piotr
|init6=P
|author6-link=
|last7=de Gier
|first7=Robert
|init7=R
|author7-link=
|last8=de Jong
|first8=Tom
|init8=T
|author8-link=
|last9=Günter
|first9=Faschig
|init9=F
|author9-link=
|etal=yes
}}</ref> and others.<ref>{{REFjournal
|last=Steven
|firstinit=JS
|author-link=J. Steven Svoboda
|last2=Van Howe
|first2init2=RS
|author2-link=Robert S. Van Howe
|etal=no
|title=Out of step: fatal flaws in the latest AAP policy report on neonatal circumcision
|journal=J Med Ethics
|location=
|last=Van Howe
|first=Robert S.
|init=RS
|author-link=Robert S. Van Howe
|etal=no
|title=Response to Vogelstein: How the 2012 AAP Task Force on circumcision went wrong
|journal=Wiley Bioethics
|location=
The Canadian Paediatric Society (CPS) took a position against non-therapeutic circumcision of boys in 1975, declaring it to have "no medical indication" and to be an "obsolete operation".<ref name="cps1975">{{REFjournal
|last=Swyer
|firstinit=P.R.PR
|author-link=
|last2=Boston
|first2init2=R.W.RW
|author2-link=
|last3=Murdock
|first3init3=A.
|author3-link=
|last4=Paré
|first4init4=C.
|author4-link=
|last5=Rees
|first5init5=E.
|author5-link=
|last6=Segal
|first6init6=S.
|author6-link=
|last7=Sinclair
|first7init7=J.C.JC
|author7-link=
|etal=no
<blockquote>
[We] do not support recommending circumcision as a routine procedure for newborns. Circumcision of newborns should not be routinely performed.<ref>{{REFjournal
|last=Outerbridge |first=Eugene |firstinit=OuterbridgeE |title=Neonatal circumcision revisited.
|journal=CMAJ
|volume=154
|last=Sorokin
|first=S. Todd
|init=ST
|author-link=
|last2=Finlay
|first2init2=J.C.JC
|author2-link=
|last3=Jeffries
|first3init3=A.L.AL
|author3-link=
|etal=yes
|Source=
|ref=<ref>{{REFjournal
|last=Sumit |first=Dave |firstinit=SumitD
|author-link=
|etal=yes