Difference between revisions of "Re B and G (children) (No 2) EWFC 3"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
WikiModEn2 (talk | contribs) |
WikiModEn2 (talk | contribs) (Add reference section.) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Construction Site}} | {{Construction Site}} | ||
| − | '''Re B and G (Children) (No 2) [2015] EWFC 3, [2015]''' is a British family law case which has attracted considerable legal commentary. The judge was Sir James Munby, President of the Family Division. | + | '''Re B and G (Children) (No 2) [2015] EWFC 3, [2015]''' is a British family law case which has attracted considerable legal commentary. The judge was Sir James Munby, President of the Family Division.<ref name="bangham2015">{{REFdocument |
| + | |title=Judgment | ||
| + | |url=https://www.familylaw.co.uk/news_and_comment/re-b-and-g-children-no-2-2015-ewfc-3 | ||
| + | |contribution= | ||
| + | |last=Bangham | ||
| + | |first=Samantha | ||
| + | |publisher=Family Law | ||
| + | |format= | ||
| + | |date=2015-01-14 | ||
| + | |accessdate=2020-09-09 | ||
| + | }}</ref> | ||
| Line 71: | Line 81: | ||
|quote= | |quote= | ||
}} | }} | ||
| + | |||
| + | {{REF}} | ||
[[Category:'... v. ...']] | [[Category:'... v. ...']] | ||
Revision as of 13:59, 9 September 2020
Construction Site
This article is work in progress and not yet part of the free encyclopedia IntactiWiki.
Re B and G (Children) (No 2) [2015] EWFC 3, [2015] is a British family law case which has attracted considerable legal commentary. The judge was Sir James Munby, President of the Family Division.[1]
External links
Proudman, Charlotte. Female Genital Mutilation: Re B and G
. Retrieved 9 September 2020.
Fox, Marie, Thomson, Michael. Bodily Integrity, Embodiment and the Regulation of Parental Choice. Journal of Law and Society. 2017; 44(4): 501-31. Retrieved 8 September 2020.
- Möller, Kai. Male and Female Genital Cutting: Between the Best Interest of the Child and Genital Mutilation. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies. 26 June 2020; DOI. Retrieved 8 September 2020.
(23 August 2020)."Aktueller Artikel im Oxford Journal of Legal Studies: Weibliche Genitalverstümmelung ist grundsätzlich falsch, und nicht nur, weil sie „anders“ sei als Praktiken an anderen Kindern", https://die-betroffenen.de, Mogis. Retrieved 9 September 2020.
.svg){kind=icon}