15,089
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
→Early twenty-first century: Add text and citation.
|accessdate=2020-11-25
}}</ref> of which the beneficiary is the American circumcision industry.
Doctors Opposing Circumcision (2013) provided evidence that the purpose of the 2012 AAP Circumcision Policy Statement was to get more money for doctors,<ref name="doc2013">{{REFdocument
|title=Commentary on American Academy of Pediatrics 2012 Circumcision Policy Statemeni
|url=https://www.doctorsopposingcircumcision.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/commentary-on-american-academy-of-pediatrics-2012-circumcision-policy-statement.pdf
|contribution=
|last=
|first=
|publisher=Doctors Opposing Circumcision
|format=PDF
|date=2013-04-01
|accessdate=2021-10-21
}}</ref>
Professor [[Peter W. Adler]], {{JD}}, (2013) argued that non-therapeutic circumcision of boys is unlawful.<ref name="adler2013">{{REFjournal