Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search

India

3,729 bytes added, Friday at 15:02
Medical science: Add URL
India has a long and rich religious history. Four major religions — Buddhism, Hinduism, Jainism, and Sikhism — originated in India. Others, including Christianity, Zoroastrianism, and Islamism, have been imported.
Islamism has not co-existed well with the other religions because of its aggressive manner of pushing [[Islam]] on non-Muslims with the sword and by such tactics as forced circumcision. For example, more than 300 British soldiers were captured by Muslims in 1780 and forcibly [[circumcised]].<refname="fcirc">{{URLwikipedia|Forced_circumcision|Forced circumcision}}</ref>
India had long been governed by the British East India Company.<ref>{{URLwikipedia|East_India_Company|East India Company}}</ref> The British Raj assumed governance of India from the East India Company in 1858.<ref>{{URLwikipedia|British_Raj|British Raj}}</ref> The British Raj decided to partition India in 1947, essentially for religious reasons. Two regions in the north of India — East and West Pakistan — would be assigned to the Dominion of Pakistan, which would be a home for Muslims. East Pakistan later became Bangladesh.<ref name="partition1947">{{URLwikipedia|Partition_of_India|Partition of India}}</ref>
 
The remainder of the Dominion of India would would be a home for non-Muslims.
 
Hindus, Sikhs, and adherents to other religions would be protected from most of the Muslims who were now in a separate nation. Pakistan now has 241.5 million Muslims and Bangladesh now has 169 million Muslims for a total of 410.5 million who have been removed from India and who cannot conveniently prey upon the non-Muslim citizens of India. The residual 14.2% Muslim population of India is now constitutes only about 172,000,000.<ref>{{URLwikipedia|Religion_in_India|Religion in India}}</ref>
 
The partition caused a mass migration with Muslims moving from India into Pakistan and non-Muslims moving from Pakistan into India. Muslims continued to conduct forced circumcisions at this time.<ref name="fcirc" />
==Medical science==
Medical science is highly advanced in India. Studies by Indian doctors have contributed to our understanding of the intact [[penis]].
* Satya Parkash (1972) discussed some of the functions of the [[foreskin]], some drawbacks to circumcision, and conditions for which [[circumcision]] should <i>not</i> be performed. Parkash described a new procedure for the plastic correction of [[phimosis]] which would save the foreskin.<ref name="parkash1972">{{REFjournal
|last=Parkash
|first=
|init=S
|author-link=
|etal=no
|title=Phimosis and its plastic correction
|trans-title=
|language=
|journal=J Indian Med Assoc
|location=
|date=1972-05-16
|volume=58
|issue=10
|pages=389-90
|url=https://www.cirp.org/library/treatment/phimosis/parkash3/
|archived=
|quote=The prepuce is not a useless structure. If proper personal hygiene is observed, the risk of malignancy is not high enough to justify its ritual excision. Besides the prepuce provides valuable spare skin for cover in various conditions. Conservation of the prepuce is fully justified even in cases with phimosis which does not resolve spontaneously or which is not giving rise to symptoms.
|pubmedID=4644911
|pubmedCID=
|accessdate=2024-07-05
}}</ref>
* Parkash et al (1973) studied the nature of the material which collects in the [[preputial sac]] of [[intact]] males. It was determined to be cast off "epithelial debris".<ref name="parkash1973">{{REFjournal
|last=Parkash
|first=
|init=S
|author-link=
|last2=Jeyakumar
|first2=
|init2=S
|author2-link=
|last3=Subramanyan
|first3=
|init3=K
|author3-link=
|last4=Chaudhuri
|first4=
|init4=S
|author4-link=
|etal=no
|title=Human subpreputial collection: its nature and formation
|trans-title=
|language=
|journal=J Urol
|location=
|date=1973-08
|volume=110
|issue=2
|pages=211-2
|url=https://www.cirp.org/library/anatomy/parkash/
|archived=
|quote=A detailed study of the subpreputial collections and histological study of 128 specimens led us to conclude that there appears to be no evidence of any glandular tissue in the subpreputial region of the penis. Smegma is an epithelial debris collecting in this space.
|pubmedID=4722614
|pubmedCID=
|DOI=10.1016/s0022-5347(17)60164-2
|accessdate=2024-07-05
}}</ref>
{{LINKS}}
{{URLwikipedia|India|India|2019-09-15}}
{{REF}}
 
[[Category:Asia]]
[[Category:India]]
16,093
edits

Navigation menu