15,638
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
→Briefs: Add link to Holm Putzke collection.
The two briefs indexed here were filed by [[Doctors Opposing Circumcision]] with the Oregon Supreme Court in the case of [[Boldt v. Boldt]], where they proved instrumental in changing the direction of that case. They have an excellent summary of American Constitutional law relevant to the non-therapeutic circumcision of male children.
* {{REFdocument
This index at ARC includes papers on medical ethics.
* [https://www.arclaw.org/papers Published papers authored by Executive Director Steven Svoboda and other ARC associates]
Doctors Opposing Circumcision also maintains a list of legal commentaries.
* {{REFweb
|url=https://www.doctorsopposingcircumcision.org/legal/
|quote=
}}
For those who read the German language, Prof. Dr. Holm Putzke, LL. M., maintains a list of commentaries in German regarding religious (non-therapeutic) circumcision on his website:
* {{REFweb
|url=http://www.holmputzke.de/index.php/kontrovers/religioese-beschneidung
|archived=
|title=Religiöse Beschneidung
|trans-title=
|language=Deutsche
|last=Putzke
|first=Holm
|author-link=Holm Putzke
|publisher=
|website=holmputzke.de
|date=
|accessdate=2020-05-10
|format=
|quote=
}}
[[Category:Legal comments]]