15,638
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
→Commentaries: Add Edge paper.
|DOI=
|accessdate=2020-05-09
}}
Peter W. Edge (2000) discusses the impact of the Human Rights Act (1998) on the practice of non-therapeutic circumcision of male children in the United Kingdom.
* {{REFjournal
|last=Edge
|first=Peter
|author-link=
|title=Male circumcision after the human rights act 1998
|journal=J Civil Liberties
|date=2000
|volume=5
|issue=
|pages=320
|url=http://www.cirp.org/library/legal/edge1/
|accessdate=2020-05-10
}}
}}
Fox & Thomson (2005) criticise the Britist Medical Associion guidance to doctors.
* {{REFjournal
|last=Fox
|first=Marie
|author-link=
|last2=Thomson
|first2=M
|author2-link=
|etal=no
|title=A covenant with the status quo? Male circumcision and the new BMA guidance to doctors
|trans-title=
|language=
|journal=J Med Ethics
|location=
|date=2005
|volume=31
|issue=8
|pages=463-9
|url=https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1734197/pdf/v031p00463.pdf
|archived=
|quote=
|pubmedID=16076971
|pubmedCID=1734197
|DOI=10.1136/jme.2004.009340
|accessdate=2020-05-10
}}
Professor [[Holm Putzke|Putzke]] (2008) points out that there is a criminal relevance of circumcising boys.