Difference between revisions of "South Korea"

From IntactiWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m (Prevalence of circumcision: Minor)
(Recent introduction: Add information on prior to American forces arrival.)
Line 37: Line 37:
 
==South Korean practice==
 
==South Korean practice==
 
===Recent introduction===
 
===Recent introduction===
A 1971 study of men who were being examined for military service found that only five percent of the men were circumcised. These men must have been born just before or during the Korean War, but were not circumcised, so this indicates that the onset of circumcision is of recent vintage.<ref>{{REFjournal
+
It is believed that circumcision had been used in South Korea prior to the arrival of American forces in 1945 to treat [[phimosis]].<ref>{{REFnews
 +
|title=The Whale Hunt
 +
|url=http://www.cirp.org/news/ohmynews2007-02-09/
 +
|last=
 +
|first=
 +
|coauthors=
 +
|publisher=OHMY NEWS INTERNATIONAL
 +
|website=
 +
|date=2007-02-09
 +
|accessdate=2021-02-09
 +
|quote=
 +
}}</ref>
 +
A 1971 study of men who were being examined for military service found that only five percent of the men were circumcised. These men must have been born just before or during the Korean War, but were not circumcised, so this indicates that the onset of non-therapeutic circumcision is of more recent vintage.<ref>{{REFjournal
 
  |last=Jung
 
  |last=Jung
 
  |init=KM
 
  |init=KM

Revision as of 18:03, 7 June 2021

Flag of South Korea

Construction Site

This article is work in progress and not yet part of the free encyclopedia IntactiWiki.

 

South Korea, a traditionally non-circumcising nation, nevertheless, adopted the practice of non-therapeutic circumcision during and after the Korean War (1950-53). The adoption of circumcision may be traced to 1950, when the United States intervened in the Korean War and large numbers of mostly circumcised American troops were sent into South Korea to aid in its defense.[1]

South Korean practice

Recent introduction

It is believed that circumcision had been used in South Korea prior to the arrival of American forces in 1945 to treat phimosis.[2] A 1971 study of men who were being examined for military service found that only five percent of the men were circumcised. These men must have been born just before or during the Korean War, but were not circumcised, so this indicates that the onset of non-therapeutic circumcision is of more recent vintage.[3]

Concept of "naturally circumcised"

Korean men have invented several reasons that they do not need a surgical circumcision, such as their foreskin is short, that it retracts when they have an erection, that it is not phimosed, or other reasons. This is called "naturally circumcised".[1]

Usual age for circumcision

Most Korean males are circumcised not in infancy but at puberty, as teenagers or in their 20s, so it is now viewed as a "rite of passage". Circumcision in infancy is rare in South Korea.[1] Ku et al. (2003) reported "a positive attitude toward circumcision in South Korean men, linking it with hygienic practices." They also reported the decision to circumcise was most often made by parents.[4]

Prevalence of circumcision

Kim et al. carried out a survey of men in the Seoul area. They found that in the 16-25 year old age group 91 percent had been circumcised, with lesser percentages with increasing age groups.[1]

Results of large scale survey

Pang & Kim (2002) carried out a large scale survey of 5,434 males, aged 0–92, and 267 practicing physicians to learn more about the effects of male circumcision in South Korea. The authors observed that South Korea is the only nation in the region where non-therapeutic circumcision of boys is practiced.[5]

Incidence and prevalence

The incidence of circumcision was found to exceed 100 percent, since the number of older males being circumcised, exceeded the birth rate.[5]

The prevalence of circumcision was 93 percent in the 20-year-old age group and 60 percent over all ages.[5]

Complaints

Of the 593 men who had had sex prior to their circumcision, 20 percent had a change in sexuality. Men were "twice as likely to have experienced diminished sexuality than improved sexuality."[5]

Reports from medical doctors

Of the doctors surveyed, 41 percent performed circumcisions. General surgeons and urologists were most likely to perform circumcisions. Unlike America, only 28 percent of obstetricians did circumcisions and no paediatricians performed circumcisions. Doctors generally were poorly informed about circumcision.[5]

Medical research

Kim & Pang (2007) studied the effect of the foreskin on masturbation. They reported that masturbatory pleasure decreased in 48% of the respondents and increased in 8%, while difficulty increased in 63% but was easier in 37%. They concluded that there was a decrease in masturbatory pleasure after circumcision.[6]

References

  1. a b c d REFjournal Kim DS, Lee JY, Pang MG. Male circumcision: a South Korean perspective. BJU Int. January 1999; 83 Suppl 1: 28-33. PMID. DOI. Retrieved 6 June 2021.
  2. REFnews (9 February 2007)."The Whale Hunt", OHMY NEWS INTERNATIONAL. Retrieved 9 February 2021.
  3. REFjournal Jung KM. A study on the foreskin and circumcision of the penis of Korean male. Korean J Public Health. 1971; 9: 369. Retrieved 6 June 2021.
  4. REFjournal Ku JH, Kim ME, Lee NK, Park YH. Circumcision practice patterns in South Korea: community based survey. Sexually Transmitted Infections. 2003; 79(1): 65-7. PMID. PMC. DOI. Retrieved 7 June 2021.
  5. a b c d e REFjournal Pang MG, Kim DS. Extraordinarily high rates of male circumcision in South Korea: history and underlying causes. BJU Int. January 2002; 89(1): 48-54. PMID. Retrieved 7 May 2021.
  6. REFjournal Kim, DaiSik, Pang, Myung-Geol. The effect of male circumcision on sexuality. BJU Int. March 2007; 99(3): 619-622. PMID. DOI. Retrieved 6 June 2021.