Difference between revisions of "Redundant foreskin"

From IntactiWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m (adjust REF)
(Add inline links.)
Line 1: Line 1:
'''Insufficient foreskin removal/redundant foreskin''' is classed technically as a complication. The major issue is cosmetic because the expected circumcised appearance has not been achieved. There are no health issues from insufficient foreskin removal. A circumcision revision is usually carried out to achieve the desired appearance.<ref>{{REFjournal
+
'''Insufficient foreskin removal/redundant foreskin''' is classed technically as a complication. The major issue is cosmetic because the expected circumcised appearance has not been achieved. There are no health issues from insufficient [[foreskin]] removal. A [[Adolescent and adult circumcision| circumcision]] revision is usually carried out to achieve the desired appearance.<ref>{{REFjournal
 
  |last=Fekete
 
  |last=Fekete
 
  |first=Ferenc
 
  |first=Ferenc
Line 30: Line 30:
 
  |accessdate=2022-02-04
 
  |accessdate=2022-02-04
 
}}</ref>
 
}}</ref>
 +
 +
There is no accepted definition of redundant foreskin.
  
 
{{SEEALSO}}
 
{{SEEALSO}}

Revision as of 17:10, 4 February 2022

Insufficient foreskin removal/redundant foreskin is classed technically as a complication. The major issue is cosmetic because the expected circumcised appearance has not been achieved. There are no health issues from insufficient foreskin removal. A circumcision revision is usually carried out to achieve the desired appearance.[1]

There is no accepted definition of redundant foreskin.

See also

References

  1. REFjournal Fekete F, Török A, Nyirády P. Revisions after unsatisfactory adult circumcisions. Int Urol Nephrol. June 2011; 43(2): 431-5. PMID. DOI. Retrieved 4 February 2022.