Difference between revisions of "Redundant foreskin"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m (adjust content) |
WikiModEn2 (talk | contribs) (Wikify.) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | '''Redundant foreskin''' (aka '''Insufficient foreskin removal''') is classed technically as a complication. The major issue is cosmetic because the expected circumcised appearance has not been achieved. There are no additional health issues from insufficient [[foreskin]] removal. A [[Adolescent and adult circumcision| circumcision]] revision is usually carried out to achieve the desired appearance.<ref>{{REFjournal | + | '''Redundant foreskin''' (aka '''Insufficient foreskin removal''') is classed technically as a [[complication]]. The major issue is cosmetic because the expected circumcised appearance has not been achieved. There are no additional health issues from insufficient [[foreskin]] removal. A [[Adolescent and adult circumcision| circumcision]] revision is usually carried out to achieve the desired appearance.<ref>{{REFjournal |
|last=Fekete | |last=Fekete | ||
|first=Ferenc | |first=Ferenc | ||
Revision as of 13:01, 14 February 2022
Redundant foreskin (aka Insufficient foreskin removal) is classed technically as a complication. The major issue is cosmetic because the expected circumcised appearance has not been achieved. There are no additional health issues from insufficient foreskin removal. A circumcision revision is usually carried out to achieve the desired appearance.[1]
There is no accepted definition of redundant foreskin.
See also
References
- ↑
Fekete F, Török A, Nyirády P. Revisions after unsatisfactory adult circumcisions. Int Urol Nephrol. June 2011; 43(2): 431-5. PMID. DOI. Retrieved 4 February 2022.
