Difference between revisions of "Circumcision maps"
WikiModEn2 (talk | contribs) (Add citation.) |
WikiModEn2 (talk | contribs) m (→U. S. Medicaid coverage of non-therapeutic circumcision: Add category.) |
||
| Line 66: | Line 66: | ||
http://www.circumstitions.com/Images/map-usa-notfund.gif | http://www.circumstitions.com/Images/map-usa-notfund.gif | ||
</center> | </center> | ||
| − | Adler has argued strongly that Medicaid payments for non-therapeutic circumcision is unlawful.<ref name="adler2011">{{REFjournal | + | <br><br> |
| + | Adler (2011) has argued strongly that Medicaid payments for non-therapeutic circumcision is unlawful.<ref name="adler2011">{{REFjournal | ||
|last=Adler | |last=Adler | ||
|first=Peter W. | |first=Peter W. | ||
| Line 89: | Line 90: | ||
[[Category:Genital cutting]] | [[Category:Genital cutting]] | ||
[[Category:Male circumcision]] | [[Category:Male circumcision]] | ||
| + | [[Category:USA]] | ||
Revision as of 17:44, 14 July 2022
Construction Site
This article is work in progress and not yet part of the free encyclopedia IntactiWiki.
Circumcision maps are used to graphically display the geographic distribution of the prevalence and/or incidence of male circumcision.
Prevalence is the percentage of all males (all ages) in a population who have been circumcised. It does not indicate the present rate (incidence) of circumcision.
Contents
World circumcision map
This map breaks down the prevalence of circumcision by state in Australia and the United States; and by province in Canada.
Map showing incidence of neonatal circumcision in U.S. hospitals
We thank Saving Our Sons (SoS) for providing this map that shows the incidence of non-therapeutic neonatal circumcision in U.S. hospitals in 2009-10. The incidence of non-therapeutic circumcision is the percentage of newborn baby boys who are being circumcised. The overall incidence of circumcision of the newborn in the United States has declined somewhat since this map was prepared.[1]
U. S. Medicaid coverage of non-therapeutic circumcision
The Congress of the United States of America created the Medicaid program in 1965 to provide medical care for lower income people. At that time, based on archaic medical data, it was falsely believed that circumcision would prevent penile cancer. Medicaid generally covered non-therapeutic circumcision for that reason. Although Medicaid is a federal mandated program, it is administered by the 50 individual states, which have some options on what services they choose to cover. Circumcision of the newborn is a non-therapeutic surgery, so eighteen states (36%} have elected to discontinue payments for such circumcisions. This map, provided by courtesy of Circumstitions - The Intactivism Pages depicts in blue the states which protect boys by refusing to pay for an injurious non-therapeutic amputation of penile tissue. The states where Medicaid still pays for the outmoded operation are depicted in red to indicate the increased danger to boys.
Adler (2011) has argued strongly that Medicaid payments for non-therapeutic circumcision is unlawful.[2]
References
- ↑
Jacobson, Deborah L., Balmert, Lauren C., Holl, Jane L., Rosoklija, Ilina, Davis, Matthew M., Johnson. Nationwide Circumcision Trends: 2003 to 2016. J Urol. January 2021; 205(1): 257-63. PMID. DOI. Retrieved 14 July 2022.
- ↑ Adler PW. It is lawful to use Medicaid to pay for circumcision?. Journal of Law and Medicine. 2011; 19: 335-353. Retrieved 8 May 2020.
