Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search

Literature about foreskin restoration

120 bytes added, 14:25, 27 July 2022
m
BJM hint
</ref> Since then, new methods have been developed through experimentation, and shared through internet in online forums.
The [[AAP]] and the [[CDC]] make no mention of foreskin restoration in their circumcision policies. The general attitude of the American medical community towards restorers is one of skepticism. Restoration is discounted as a placebo, and restorers are accused of being obsessed and psychologically unstable. A tireless advocate of [[circumcision]] and major critic of [[foreskin restoration]] is [[Brian J. Morris]].
After being part of an interview for a magazine article, this editor found out that the same magazine had already published an article on the topic some years ago, fact that was probably ignored by the interviewer. While I mentioned to the interviewer how the AAP systematically ignores foreskin restorers in their policy statement, not realizing that restorers are the "unhappy customers" of this unnecessary procedure, this comment unfortunately was also cut from the printed interview. Perhaps it was considered too confrontational, or the interviewer did not realize the importance of this contrast.
|first=
|init=T
|author-link=Tim Hammond
|etal=no
|title=A preliminary poll of men circumcised in infancy or childhood
administrator, administrators, Bureaucrats, Interface administrators, Administrators
22,335
edits

Navigation menu