15,940
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Wikify.
In the long history of genital mutilation aka [[foreskin]] [[amputation]] aka [[circumcision]], there have been many false alleged reasons why this should be a ''medical procedure''. Please note that some of the alleged medical reasons are rather pseudo-hygienical reasons which should never be solved by cutting off [[intact ]] body parts.
{{Incomplete}}
* Paralysis of the bladder - 1875: [[Lewis Albert Sayre|Lewis A. Sayre]]<ref name="Sayre1875"/>
In 1958, [[Christine F. McDonald]] said "the same reasons that apply for the [[circumcision ]] of males are generally valid when considered for the female."<ref name="McDonald1958">{{McDonald1958}}</ref>
In 1966, Masters and Johnson erroneous claim that there is no difference in sensitivity between penises with and without [[foreskin]].
: ({{NOTE}} Their work helps propagate the medical dogma that circumcision has no effect on sexuality go practically unquestioned for nearly the next four decades.)<ref name="MastersJohnson1966">{{REFbook
|last=Masters & Johnson