Human papillomavirus: Difference between revisions

WikiAdmin (talk | contribs)
m add SEEALSO: Cervical cancer
Add text and Wikify.
 
(9 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
The human papillomavirus (HPV) is the most common STD in the U.S. It is known to cause genital warts, and it has been implicated as the cause of cervical cancer in women.
The human papillomavirus (HPV) is the most common STD in the U.S. It is known to cause genital warts, and it has been implicated as the cause of [[cervical cancer]] in women and [[penile cancer]] in men.


== Prevention ==
== Prevention ==


Two vaccines have recently been developed to prevent HPV acquisition. In the past, circumcision was assumed to prevent the acquisition of HPV, thus reducing the risk of cervical cancer, but this was supported by dubious studies as outlined below.
Two vaccines have recently been developed to prevent HPV acquisition. In the past, [[circumcision]] was assumed to prevent the acquisition of HPV, thus reducing the risk of cervical cancer, but this was supported by dubious studies as outlined below.


== Circumcision and HPV ==
== Circumcision and HPV ==
Line 9: Line 9:
The association of HPV transmission with [[circumcision]] has been a heavily debated topic for many years. As more recent studies enact more rigorous controls and use larger study groups, the association between circumcision and HPV has become more clear.
The association of HPV transmission with [[circumcision]] has been a heavily debated topic for many years. As more recent studies enact more rigorous controls and use larger study groups, the association between circumcision and HPV has become more clear.


A classic 1993 study on HPV came up with the following conclusions: "Uncircumcised men had a lower prevalence of genital warts than circumcised men... The presence of the foreskin may confer non specific protection of the proximal penis from acquisition of HPV infection."
A classic 1993 study on HPV came up with the following conclusions: "[[Uncircumcised]] men had a lower prevalence of genital warts than circumcised men... The presence of the foreskin may confer non specific protection of the proximal penis from acquisition of HPV infection."
<ref>{{REFjournal
<ref>{{REFjournal
  |last=Cook
  |last=Cook
  |first=L.S.
  |init=LS
  |last2=Koutsky
  |last2=Koutsky
  |first2=L.A.
  |init2=LA
  |last3=Holmes
  |last3=Holmes
  |first4=K.K.
  |init3=KK
  |title=Clinical presentation of genital warts among circumcised and uncircumcised heterosexual men attending an urban STD clinic
  |title=Clinical presentation of genital warts among circumcised and uncircumcised heterosexual men attending an urban STD clinic
  |journal=Genitourin Med
  |journal=Genitourin Med
Line 31: Line 31:
}}</ref>
}}</ref>


A meta-analysis performed by Dr. [[Robert Van Howe]] in 2006 found no significant association between circumcision status and HPV infection. "The medical literature does not support the claim that circumcision reduces the risk for genital HPV infection"<ref>{{REFjournal
A meta-analysis performed by Dr. [[Robert S. Van Howe]] in 2006 found no significant association between circumcision status and HPV infection. "The medical literature does not support the claim that circumcision reduces the risk for genital HPV infection"<ref>{{REFjournal
  |last=Van Howe
  |last=Van Howe
  |first=Robert S.
  |first=Robert S.
  |author-link=Robert Van Howe
|init=RS
  |author-link=Robert S. Van Howe
  |title=Human papillomavirus and circumcision: A meta-analysis
  |title=Human papillomavirus and circumcision: A meta-analysis
  |journal=Journal of Infection
  |journal=Journal of Infection
Line 51: Line 52:
Most studies on HPV performed before 2006 had poor controls and relatively small study groups.  In order to clear up this confusion, a recent 2008 study on HPV had an enormous study group of almost nine thousand men in the United States. This is currently the largest study on circumcision and HPV ever performed in the U.S. And since the study was performed in the U.S., the results are directly applicable to people who live in the U.S. The study concluded:
Most studies on HPV performed before 2006 had poor controls and relatively small study groups.  In order to clear up this confusion, a recent 2008 study on HPV had an enormous study group of almost nine thousand men in the United States. This is currently the largest study on circumcision and HPV ever performed in the U.S. And since the study was performed in the U.S., the results are directly applicable to people who live in the U.S. The study concluded:


"The percentage of circumcised men reporting a diagnosis of genital warts was significantly higher than uncircumcised men, 4.5% (95% CI, 3.6%–5.6%) versus 2.4% (95% CI, 1.5%–4.0%)".
"The percentage of circumcised men reporting a diagnosis of genital warts was significantly higher than [[uncircumcised]] men, 4.5% (95% CI, 3.6%–5.6%) versus 2.4% (95% CI, 1.5%–4.0%)".
<ref>{{REFjournal
<ref>{{REFjournal
  |last=Dinh
  |last=Dinh
  |first=T.H.
  |init=TH
|first2=M.
  |last2=Sternberg
  |last2=Sternberg
  |first3=E.F.
  |init2=M
  |last3=Dunne
  |last3=Dunne
  |first4=L.E.
  |init3=EF
  |last4=Markowitz
  |last4=Markowitz
|init4=LE
  |title=Genital Warts Among 18- to 59-Year-Olds in the United States, National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 1999–2004
  |title=Genital Warts Among 18- to 59-Year-Olds in the United States, National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 1999–2004
  |journal=Sexually Transmitted Diseases
  |journal=Sexually Transmitted Diseases
Line 75: Line 76:
}}</ref>
}}</ref>


A 2011 study on University of Washington students found no correlation between circumcision and HPV.<ref>{{REFjournal
A 2011 study on {{UNI|University of Washington|UW}} students found no correlation between circumcision and HPV.<ref>{{REFjournal
  |last=VanBuskirk
  |last=VanBuskirk
  |first=Kelley
  |first=Kelley
|init=K
  |last2=Winer
  |last2=Winer
  |first2=Rachel L.
  |first2=Rachel L.
|init2=RL
  |last3=Hughes
  |last3=Hughes
  |first3=James P.
  |first3=James P.
|init3=JP
  |last4=Feng
  |last4=Feng
  |first4=Qinghua
  |first4=Qinghua
|init4=Q
  |last5=Arima
  |last5=Arima
  |first5=Yuzo
  |first5=Yuzo
|init5=Y
  |last6=Lee
  |last6=Lee
  |first6=Shu-Kuang
  |first6=Shu-Kuang
|init6=SK
  |last7=Stern
  |last7=Stern
  |first7=Michael E.
  |first7=Michael E.
|init7=ME
  |last8=O'Reilly
  |last8=O'Reilly
  |first8=Sandra F.
  |first8=Sandra F.
|init8=SF
  |last9=Koutsky
  |last9=Koutsky
  |first9=Laura A.
  |first9=Laura A.
|init9=LA
  |title=Circumcision and Acquisition of Human Papillomavirus Infection in Young Men
  |title=Circumcision and Acquisition of Human Papillomavirus Infection in Young Men
  |journal=Sexually Transmitted Diseases
  |journal=Sexually Transmitted Diseases
Line 106: Line 116:
  |date=2011-12
  |date=2011-12
  |accessdate=2011-09-02
  |accessdate=2011-09-02
}}</ref> This study tested for HPV at three sites: the scrotum/shaft skin, the glans, and in urine samples. The authors of this study found that in circumcised men, the scrotum/shaft skin contained was most often the site of HPV infection. The authors also note that many large-scale studies fail to test for HPV on scrotum/shaft skin.
}}</ref> This study tested for HPV at three sites: the [[scrotal skin|scrotum]]/[[shaft skin]], the glans, and in [[urine]] samples. The authors of this study found that in circumcised men, the [[scrotal skin|scrotum]]/[[shaft skin]] contained was most often the site of HPV infection. The authors also note that many large-scale studies fail to test for HPV on [[scrotal skin|scrotum]]/[[shaft skin]].


== Cure HPV? ==
== Cure HPV? ==
Line 134: Line 144:
{{SEEALSO}}
{{SEEALSO}}
* [[Cervical cancer]]
* [[Cervical cancer]]
* [[Penile cancer]]


{{REF}}
{{REF}}
Line 143: Line 154:
[[Category:From Intactipedia]]
[[Category:From Intactipedia]]
[[Category:From IntactWiki]]
[[Category:From IntactWiki]]
[[de:Humane Papillomaviren]]