15,635
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Add link in SEEALSO section.
|last=
|first=
|publisher=[[Doctors Opposing Circumcision(D.O.C.)]]
|date=2016
|title=HIV/AIDS
}}</ref>Of the three {{#tip-text:RCT|Randomized controlled trial}}s being used by the [[WHO]] to endorse circumcision as [[HIV]] prevention, Stephen Moses and [[Robert C. Bailey]] headed the {{#tip-text:RCT|Randomized controlled trial}} that was carried out in Kenya.<ref>{{RCT Bailey et al 2007}}</ref> Moses obviously brought his pre-existing bias in favor of male circumcision into the trial, so he did not start from a neutral position.
Moses' research on circumcision protection from [[HIV]] infection is now completely discredited. Boyle & Hill (2011) reviewed the three randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and found disabling methodological and statistical errors in all three. Although a 60 percent ''relative'' reduction in [[HIV]] was claimed, the ''absolute'' reduction was a statistically insignificant 1.3 percent.<ref name="boyle-hill2011">{{BoyleGJ HillG 2011}}</ref> [[Michel Garenne |Garenne]] & Matthews (2019) report that circumcised men have as much [[HIV]] infection as intact men.<ref>{{REFjournal
|last=Garenne
|init=M
|author-link=Michel Garenne
|last2=Matthews
|init2=A
{{SEEALSO}}
* [[Bias]]
* [[Canada]]
* [[Circumcised doctors]]
[[Category:Researcher]]
[[Category:Author]]
[[Category:Canada]]