Difference between revisions of "Psychological literature about male circumcision"

From IntactiWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m (→‎Introduction)
(→‎Articles: Add article.)
(3 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 5: Line 5:
  
 
==Introduction==
 
==Introduction==
−
The [[circumcision industry]] would like parents and the public to believe that [[circumcision]] is psychologically benign and has no effect on the patient, therefore the information provided to satisfy the requirements of [[informed consent]] typically excludes any discussion of the psychological [[trauma]], injury, and effects of circumcision.<ref> </ref>
+
The [[circumcision industry]] would like parents and the public to believe that [[circumcision]] is psychologically benign and has no effect on the patient, therefore the information provided to satisfy the requirements of [[informed consent]] typically excludes any discussion of the psychological [[trauma]], injury, and emotional effects of circumcision.<ref name="tye2023">{{REFjournal
 +
|last=Tye
 +
|first=
 +
|init=MC
 +
|author-link=
 +
|last2=Sardi
 +
|first2=
 +
|init2=LM
 +
|author2-link=
 +
|etal=no
 +
|title=Psychological, psychosocial, and psychosexual aspects of penile circumcision
 +
|trans-title=
 +
|language=
 +
|journal=Int J Impot Res
 +
|location=
 +
|date=2023-05
 +
|volume=35
 +
|issue=3
 +
|pages=242-8
 +
|url=https://www.nature.com/articles/s41443-022-00553-9
 +
|archived=
 +
|quote=Policy statements on penile circumcision have focused primarily on disease, dysfunction, or sensation, with relatively little consideration of psychological and psychosocial implications of the procedure. There has also been minimal consideration of potential qualitative changes in the subjective experience of sexual activity following changes in penile anatomy (foreskin removal) or associated sexual biomechanics.
 +
|pubmedID=35347302
 +
|DOI=10.1038/s41443-022-00553-9
 +
|accessdate=2024-06-22
 +
}}</ref>
  
 
Some of the literature cited here will include certain articles of a psychological nature that appeared in medical journals.
 
Some of the literature cited here will include certain articles of a psychological nature that appeared in medical journals.
Line 180: Line 205:
 
  |accessdate=2024-06-22
 
  |accessdate=2024-06-22
 
}}
 
}}
 +
* {{REFjournal
 +
|last=Prescott
 +
|first=
 +
|init=JW
 +
|author-link=
 +
|etal=no
 +
|title=Body pleasure and the origins of violence.
 +
|trans-title=
 +
|language=
 +
|journal=The Bulletin of The Atomic Scientists
 +
|location=
 +
|date=1975-11
 +
|volume=
 +
|issue=
 +
|article=
 +
|page=
 +
|pages=10-20
 +
|url=http://www.violence.de/prescott/bulletin/article.html
 +
|archived=
 +
|quote=
 +
|pubmedID=
 +
|pubmedCID=
 +
|DOI=
 +
|doi=
 +
|accessdate=2024-06-22
 +
}}
 +
* {{REFjournal
 +
|last=Richards
 +
|first=
 +
|init=MPM
 +
|author-link=
 +
|last2=Bernal
 +
|first2=
 +
|init2=JF
 +
|author2-link=
 +
|last3=Brackbill
 +
|first3=
 +
|init3=Y
 +
|author3-link=
 +
|etal=no
 +
|title=Early behavioral differences: gender or circumcision?
 +
|trans-title=
 +
|language=
 +
|journal=Dev Psychobiol
 +
|location=
 +
|date=1976-01
 +
|volume=9
 +
|issue=1
 +
|pages=89-95
 +
|url=https://www.cirp.org/library/psych/brackbill/
 +
|archived=
 +
|quote=We have reported here some direct and indirect evidence indicating that circumcision has an influence of unknown duration on the behavior and psychophysiology of male infants and we suggest that so-called neonatal "gender" differences may instead be circumcision differences.
 +
|pubmedID=767183
 +
|pubmedCID=
 +
|DOI=10.1002/dev.420090112
 +
|accessdate=2024-06-22
 +
}}
 +
 
* {{REFjournal
 
* {{REFjournal
 
  |last=Aydogmus
 
  |last=Aydogmus
Line 243: Line 326:
 
  |issue=3
 
  |issue=3
 
  |pages=242-8
 
  |pages=242-8
−
  |url=
+
  |url=https://www.nature.com/articles/s41443-022-00553-9
 
  |archived=
 
  |archived=
 
  |quote=Policy statements on penile circumcision have focused primarily on disease, dysfunction, or sensation, with relatively little consideration of psychological and psychosocial implications of the procedure. There has also been minimal consideration of potential qualitative changes in the subjective experience of sexual activity following changes in penile anatomy (foreskin removal) or associated sexual biomechanics.
 
  |quote=Policy statements on penile circumcision have focused primarily on disease, dysfunction, or sensation, with relatively little consideration of psychological and psychosocial implications of the procedure. There has also been minimal consideration of potential qualitative changes in the subjective experience of sexual activity following changes in penile anatomy (foreskin removal) or associated sexual biomechanics.
Line 251: Line 334:
 
}}
 
}}
 
{{REF}}
 
{{REF}}
 +
 +
 +
 +
 +
[[Category:Circumcision]]
 +
[[Category:Male sexuality]]
 +
[[Category:Psychology]]
 +
[[Category:Trauma]]

Revision as of 00:12, 23 June 2024

Construction Site

This article is work in progress and not yet part of the free encyclopedia IntactiWiki.

 

This page collects and indexes psychological literature about male circumcision.

Work in progress: The following information does not claim to be complete. More content will be added gradually.

Introduction

The circumcision industry would like parents and the public to believe that circumcision is psychologically benign and has no effect on the patient, therefore the information provided to satisfy the requirements of informed consent typically excludes any discussion of the psychological trauma, injury, and emotional effects of circumcision.[1]

Some of the literature cited here will include certain articles of a psychological nature that appeared in medical journals.

Articles

  • REFjournal Aydogmus Y, Semiz M, Er O, Bas O, Atay I, Kilinc MF. Psychological and sexual effects of circumcision in adult males. Can Urol Assoc J. May 2016; 10(5-6): E156-E160. PMID. PMC. DOI. Retrieved 22 June 2024.
    Quote: Our aim was to investigate the psychological and sexual effects of circumcision in adult men, and analyze these changes following circumcision.
  • REFjournal Tye MC, Sardi LM. Psychological, psychosocial, and psychosexual aspects of penile circumcision. Int J Impot Res. May 2023; 35(3): 242-8. PMID. DOI. Retrieved 22 June 2024.
    Quote: Policy statements on penile circumcision have focused primarily on disease, dysfunction, or sensation, with relatively little consideration of psychological and psychosocial implications of the procedure. There has also been minimal consideration of potential qualitative changes in the subjective experience of sexual activity following changes in penile anatomy (foreskin removal) or associated sexual biomechanics.

References

  1. ↑ REFjournal Tye MC, Sardi LM. Psychological, psychosocial, and psychosexual aspects of penile circumcision. Int J Impot Res. May 2023; 35(3): 242-8. PMID. DOI. Retrieved 22 June 2024.
    Quote: Policy statements on penile circumcision have focused primarily on disease, dysfunction, or sensation, with relatively little consideration of psychological and psychosocial implications of the procedure. There has also been minimal consideration of potential qualitative changes in the subjective experience of sexual activity following changes in penile anatomy (foreskin removal) or associated sexual biomechanics.
Retrieved from "https://en.intactiwiki.org/w/index.php?title=Psychological_literature_about_male_circumcision&oldid=38643"