Difference between revisions of "Canada"
WikiModEn2 (talk | contribs) |
WikiModEn2 (talk | contribs) (Add Patel) |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
==History== | ==History== | ||
| + | |||
| + | on-therapeutic circumcision of children is offensive to many Canadian minorities. The French-speaking people of Quebec and elsewhere generally do not favor circumcision. Male circumcision is not part of the culture of Inuit, First Nations, and Métis populations (4.3% of the population). | ||
| + | |||
| + | Patel (1966) reported his findings on neonatal circumcision in Kingston, Ontario, Canada. Patel reported on the complications experienced in a series of 100 consecutive male infants. He also reported on the incidence of circumcision at Kingston General Hospital in Kingston, Ontario.<ref>{{REFjournal | ||
| + | |last=Patel | ||
| + | |first=Hawa | ||
| + | |author-link= | ||
| + | |title=The problem of routine infant circumcision | ||
| + | |journal= Can Med Assoc J | ||
| + | |date=1066 | ||
| + | |volume=95 | ||
| + | |issue= | ||
| + | |pages=576-81 | ||
| + | |url=http://www.cirp.org/library/procedure/patel/ | ||
| + | |accessdate=2019-10-25 | ||
| + | }}</ref> | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
Canada, like other English-speaking nations formerly circumcised most of its boys, with circumcision rates in the sixty-seventy percent range in the 1960s.<ref>{{REFjournal | Canada, like other English-speaking nations formerly circumcised most of its boys, with circumcision rates in the sixty-seventy percent range in the 1960s.<ref>{{REFjournal | ||
| Line 26: | Line 44: | ||
}}</ref> | }}</ref> | ||
| − | + | N | |
==Position statements of medical societies.== | ==Position statements of medical societies.== | ||
Revision as of 02:09, 26 October 2019
Construction Site
This article is work in progress and not yet part of the free encyclopedia IntactiWiki.
The status of non-therapeutic circumcision in Canada has been poorly reported. This page is an attempt to correct that situation.
History
on-therapeutic circumcision of children is offensive to many Canadian minorities. The French-speaking people of Quebec and elsewhere generally do not favor circumcision. Male circumcision is not part of the culture of Inuit, First Nations, and Métis populations (4.3% of the population).
Patel (1966) reported his findings on neonatal circumcision in Kingston, Ontario, Canada. Patel reported on the complications experienced in a series of 100 consecutive male infants. He also reported on the incidence of circumcision at Kingston General Hospital in Kingston, Ontario.[1]
Canada, like other English-speaking nations formerly circumcised most of its boys, with circumcision rates in the sixty-seventy percent range in the 1960s.[2]
N
Position statements of medical societies.
The Canadian Paediatric Society took a position against non-therapeutic circumcision of boys in 1975, declaring it to have "no medical indication" and to be an "obsolete operation".[3]
Canada has fourteen single-payer health insurance plans — one for each of the ten provinces and three territories and a 14th plan for government employees. The British Columbia HIP stopped paying for non-therapeutic circumcision in the 1980s. One by one, all other HIPs have stopped paying for non-therapeutic circumcision. Third-party payment for non-therapeutic circumcision is not presently available anywhere in Canada.
References
- ↑
Patel, Hawa. The problem of routine infant circumcision. Can Med Assoc J. 1066; 95: 576-81. Retrieved 25 October 2019.
- ↑ Wirth, John L.. Current circumcision practices: Canada. Pediatrics. 1980; 66(5): 705-8. PMID. Retrieved 25 October 2019.
- ↑ Swyer, PR, Boston, RW, Murdock, A, Paré, C, Rees, E, Segal, S, Sinclair, JC. FN 75 Circumcision in the newborn period. CPS News Bull Suppl. 1975; 8(2): 1-2. Retrieved 25 October 2019.
