Difference between revisions of "Canada"
WikiModEn2 (talk | contribs) (Add Canadian Death) |
m (reformattings) |
||
| Line 40: | Line 40: | ||
|etal=no | |etal=no | ||
|title=Current circumcision practices: Canada | |title=Current circumcision practices: Canada | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
|journal=Pediatrics | |journal=Pediatrics | ||
|location= | |location= | ||
| Line 56: | Line 54: | ||
}}</ref> | }}</ref> | ||
| − | ==Position statements of medical societies | + | ==Position statements of medical societies== |
The [[Canadian Paediatric Society]] (CPS) took a position against non-therapeutic circumcision of boys in 1975, declaring it to have "no medical indication" and to be an "obsolete operation".<ref name="cps1975">{{REFjournal | The [[Canadian Paediatric Society]] (CPS) took a position against non-therapeutic circumcision of boys in 1975, declaring it to have "no medical indication" and to be an "obsolete operation".<ref name="cps1975">{{REFjournal | ||
|last=Swyer | |last=Swyer | ||
| − | |first= | + | |first=P.R. |
|author-link= | |author-link= | ||
|last2=Boston | |last2=Boston | ||
| − | |first2= | + | |first2=R.W. |
|author2-link= | |author2-link= | ||
|last3=Murdock | |last3=Murdock | ||
| − | |first3=A | + | |first3=A. |
|author3-link= | |author3-link= | ||
|last4=Paré | |last4=Paré | ||
| − | |first4=C | + | |first4=C. |
|author4-link= | |author4-link= | ||
|last5=Rees | |last5=Rees | ||
| − | |first5=E | + | |first5=E. |
|author5-link= | |author5-link= | ||
|last6=Segal | |last6=Segal | ||
| − | |first6=S | + | |first6=S. |
|author6-link= | |author6-link= | ||
|last7=Sinclair | |last7=Sinclair | ||
| − | |first7= | + | |first7=J.C. |
|author7-link= | |author7-link= | ||
|etal=no | |etal=no | ||
|title=FN 75 Circumcision in the newborn period | |title=FN 75 Circumcision in the newborn period | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
|journal=CPS News Bull Suppl | |journal=CPS News Bull Suppl | ||
|location= | |location= | ||
| Line 102: | Line 98: | ||
|first=Eugene | |first=Eugene | ||
|author-link= | |author-link= | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
|etal=yes | |etal=yes | ||
|title=Neonatal circumcision revisited | |title=Neonatal circumcision revisited | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
|journal=Can Med Assoc J | |journal=Can Med Assoc J | ||
|location= | |location= | ||
| Line 147: | Line 117: | ||
<blockquote>While there may be a benefit for some boys in high-risk populations and circumstances where the procedure could be considered for disease reduction or treatment, the Canadian Paediatric Society does not recommend the routine circumcision of every newborn male.<ref name="cps2015">{{REFjournal | <blockquote>While there may be a benefit for some boys in high-risk populations and circumstances where the procedure could be considered for disease reduction or treatment, the Canadian Paediatric Society does not recommend the routine circumcision of every newborn male.<ref name="cps2015">{{REFjournal | ||
|last=Sorokin | |last=Sorokin | ||
| − | |first=S Todd | + | |first=S. Todd |
|author-link= | |author-link= | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
|etal=yes | |etal=yes | ||
|title=Newborn male circumcision | |title=Newborn male circumcision | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
|journal=Paediatr Child Health | |journal=Paediatr Child Health | ||
|location= | |location= | ||
| Line 183: | Line 127: | ||
|issue=6 | |issue=6 | ||
|pages=311-20 | |pages=311-20 | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
|quote= | |quote= | ||
|pubmedID=26435672 | |pubmedID=26435672 | ||
| Line 197: | Line 139: | ||
|first=Sumit | |first=Sumit | ||
|author-link= | |author-link= | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
|etal=yes | |etal=yes | ||
|title= | |title= | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
|journal=Can Urol Assoc J | |journal=Can Urol Assoc J | ||
|location= | |location= | ||
| Line 279: | Line 195: | ||
|quote= | |quote= | ||
}}</ref> | }}</ref> | ||
| − | |||
==Availability of third-party payment== | ==Availability of third-party payment== | ||
| Line 289: | Line 204: | ||
|author-link= | |author-link= | ||
|last2=Muller | |last2=Muller | ||
| − | |first2=Andries J | + | |first2=Andries J. |
|author2-link= | |author2-link= | ||
|etal=no | |etal=no | ||
|title=Parents' rationale for male circumcision | |title=Parents' rationale for male circumcision | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
|journal=Can Fam Physician | |journal=Can Fam Physician | ||
|location= | |location= | ||
| Line 311: | Line 224: | ||
==Reasons for circumcision== | ==Reasons for circumcision== | ||
| − | Rediger & Muller (2013) found "newborn male circumcision rates continue to be heavily influenced by the circumcision status of the child's father."<ref name="rediger-muller2013" /> | + | Rediger & Muller (2013) found "newborn male circumcision rates continue to be heavily influenced by the circumcision status of the child's father."<ref name="rediger-muller2013"/> |
==Canadian circumcision deaths== | ==Canadian circumcision deaths== | ||
| Line 321: | Line 234: | ||
|language= | |language= | ||
|last=Newell | |last=Newell | ||
| − | |first= | + | |first=T.E.C. |
|author-link= | |author-link= | ||
|publisher=British Columbia Coroner's Service | |publisher=British Columbia Coroner's Service | ||
| Line 330: | Line 243: | ||
|quote= | |quote= | ||
}} | }} | ||
| − | |||
{{REF}} | {{REF}} | ||
Revision as of 11:47, 27 October 2019
Construction Site
This article is work in progress and not yet part of the free encyclopedia IntactiWiki.
The status of non-therapeutic circumcision in Canada has been poorly reported. This page is an attempt to correct that situation.
Contents
History
Non-therapeutic circumcision of children is not part of the culture of many Canadian minorities. The French-speaking people of Quebec and elsewhere generally do not favor circumcision. Male circumcision is not part of the culture of indigenous Inuit, First Nations, and Métis populations (4.3% of the population).
Pirie (1927), in a presentation to the Canadian Society for the Study of Diseases of Children, described circumcision as "very common".[1]
Patel (1966) reported his findings on neonatal circumcision in Kingston, Ontario, Canada. Patel reported on the complications experienced in a series of 100 consecutive male infants. He also reported on the incidence of circumcision at Kingston General Hospital in Kingston, Ontario. Patel reported an incidence of circumcision of 48 percent. This is for one hospital in Kingston, ON but has been widely cited as the rate for all Canada.[2]
Canada, like other English-speaking nations formerly circumcised most of its boys, with circumcision rates in the 40 to 70 percent range in the 1960s.[3]
Position statements of medical societies
The Canadian Paediatric Society (CPS) took a position against non-therapeutic circumcision of boys in 1975, declaring it to have "no medical indication" and to be an "obsolete operation".[4]
The CPS revisited circumcision in 1996 and recommended, "Circumcision should not be routinely performed."[5]
The CPS again considered infant circumcision in 2015. The CPS stated:
While there may be a benefit for some boys in high-risk populations and circumstances where the procedure could be considered for disease reduction or treatment, the Canadian Paediatric Society does not recommend the routine circumcision of every newborn male.[6]
The Canadian Urological Association (CUA) considered the matter of circumcision and issued a statement in February 2018. The CUA concluded, "Given the socioeconomic, educational status, and health demographics of our population, universal neonatal circumcision cannot be justified based on the current evidence available.[7]
Reported incidence of non-therapeutic child circumcision
The reported incidence of child circumcision in Canada varies by province and has diminished over time. Newfoundland has always had a very low incidence of child circumcision.
Johnston (1995) reported that the incidence of child circumcision in Canada had fallen from 60 percent a generation ago to an estimated 25 percent.[8]
The Montreal Gazette (2006) reported that the incidence of circumcision has fallen by 36 percent to 14 percent according to the Association for Genital Integrity, while Statistics Canada reported a high of 29.5 percent in P.E.I. and a low of 1.1 percent in Nova Scotia.[9] [10]
Availability of third-party payment
Canada has fourteen single-payer health insurance plans — one for each of the ten provinces and three territories and a 14th plan for government employees. The British Columbia HIP stopped paying for non-therapeutic circumcision in the 1980s. Ontario HIP stopped payment for non-therapeutic circumcision in July 1995; Saskatchewan stopped in 1996. One by one, all other HIPs have stopped paying for non-therapeutic circumcision. Manitoba HIP was the last to stop, but only after the wrong boy was circumcised at St. Boniface Hospital.[11]
Third-party payment for non-therapeutic circumcision is not presently available anywhere in Canada. Parents who wish to have a son circumcised must pay out-of-pocket for the costs of the circumcision.[12]
Reasons for circumcision
Rediger & Muller (2013) found "newborn male circumcision rates continue to be heavily influenced by the circumcision status of the child's father."[12]
Canadian circumcision deaths
Newell, T.E.C. (22 August 2002). JUDGEMENT OF INQUIRY INTO THE DEATH OF McWILLIS[,
RYLEIGH ROMAN BRYAN], British Columbia Coroner's Service. Retrieved 26 October 2019.
References
- ↑
Pirie, George R.. The story of circumcision. Can Med Assoc J. July 1927; 17(12): 1540-2. Retrieved 26 October 2019.
- ↑ Patel, Hawa. The problem of routine infant circumcision. Can Med Assoc J. 1066; 95: 576-81. Retrieved 25 October 2019.
- ↑ Wirth, John L.. Current circumcision practices: Canada. Pediatrics. 1980; 66(5): 705-8. PMID. Retrieved 25 October 2019.
- ↑ Swyer, P.R., Boston, R.W., Murdock, A., Paré, C., Rees, E., Segal, S., Sinclair, J.C.. FN 75 Circumcision in the newborn period. CPS News Bull Suppl. 1975; 8(2): 1-2. Retrieved 25 October 2019.
- ↑ Outerbridge, Eugene, et al. Neonatal circumcision revisited. Can Med Assoc J. 15 March 1996; 154(6): 769-80. PMID. PMC. Retrieved 26 October 2019.
- ↑ Sorokin, S. Todd, et al. Newborn male circumcision. Paediatr Child Health. August 2015; 20(6): 311-20. PMID. PMC. DOI. Retrieved 26 October 2019.
- ↑ Dave, Sumit, et al. [1]. Can Urol Assoc J. February 2018; 12(2): 18-28. Retrieved 26 October 2019.
- ↑
Johnston, David (11 September 1995)."Under the Knife", Toronto Star. Retrieved 26 October 2019.
- ↑ (23 March 2006)."Rates of circumcision slashed in past 30 years.", The Gazette. Retrieved 26 October 2019.
- ↑ MacDonald, Andrea (25 March 2006)."Circumcisions continue to drop: Province has second-lowest rate in the country", Halifax Daily News. Retrieved 26 October 2019.
- ↑ "Circumcision mix-up", Canada.com. Retrieved 26 October 2019.
- ↑ a b Rediger, Chris, Muller, Andries J.. Parents' rationale for male circumcision. Can Fam Physician. February 2013; 59(2): e110-5. PMID. PMC. Retrieved 26 October 2019.
