Difference between revisions of "Glandular adhesion (of remnant foreskin)"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
WikiModEn2 (talk | contribs) (Add citation.) |
WikiModEn2 (talk | contribs) (Wikify.) |
||
(5 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
|etal=no | |etal=no | ||
|title=Circumcision mishaps in Nigerian children | |title=Circumcision mishaps in Nigerian children | ||
− | |||
− | |||
|journal=Ann Afr Med | |journal=Ann Afr Med | ||
|location= | |location= | ||
Line 28: | Line 26: | ||
|accessdate=2022-02-21 | |accessdate=2022-02-21 | ||
}} | }} | ||
− | Example</ref> <ref name="ekenze2013">{{REFjournal | + | Example</ref> <ref name="tempark2013">{{REFjournal |
+ | |last=Tempark | ||
+ | |first=Therdpong | ||
+ | |init=T | ||
+ | |author-link= | ||
+ | |last2=Wu | ||
+ | |first2=Tim | ||
+ | |init2=T | ||
+ | |author2-link= | ||
+ | |last3=Singer | ||
+ | |first3=Craig | ||
+ | |init3=C | ||
+ | |author3-link= | ||
+ | |etal=no | ||
+ | |title=Dermatological complications of circumcision: lesson learned from cases in a pediatric dermatology practice | ||
+ | |journal=Pediatr Dermatol | ||
+ | |location= | ||
+ | |date=2013-05-20 | ||
+ | |volume=30 | ||
+ | |issue=5 | ||
+ | |article= | ||
+ | |page= | ||
+ | |pages=519-28 | ||
+ | |url=https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/pde.12140 | ||
+ | |archived= | ||
+ | |quote= | ||
+ | |pubmedID=23683078 | ||
+ | |pubmedCID= | ||
+ | |DOI=10.1111/pde.12140 | ||
+ | |accessdate=2022-01-21 | ||
+ | }}</ref><ref name="ekenze2013">{{REFjournal | ||
|last=Ekenze | |last=Ekenze | ||
|first= | |first= | ||
Line 39: | Line 67: | ||
|etal=no | |etal=no | ||
|title=Complications of Neonatal Circumcision Requiring Surgical Intervention in a Developing Country | |title=Complications of Neonatal Circumcision Requiring Surgical Intervention in a Developing Country | ||
− | |||
− | |||
|journal= | |journal= | ||
|location= | |location= | ||
Line 50: | Line 76: | ||
|pages=292-7 | |pages=292-7 | ||
|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180728185043id_/https://watermark.silverchair.com/fmt020.pdf?token=AQECAHi208BE49Ooan9kkhW_Ercy7Dm3ZL_9Cf3qfKAc485ysgAAAaYwggGiBgkqhkiG9w0BBwagggGTMIIBjwIBADCCAYgGCSqGSIb3DQEHATAeBglghkgBZQMEAS4wEQQMyFWECbJanngkvwpcAgEQgIIBWarThATgppuUKQzxaV3_BbTkmLgAc-cv46UnwsNw92ePBelfKGEIQDBLDq00bwJkpf_aT9o9Ga5J5ddgE_-UHAlyYWRgDk31U6VQIZswyklAl4pJh6rxz5IzRtKxZah7n6yDWZGmrgR3ujXyGdhX49fMVdkEE8Zz1IQtxT2H6eZOByvkvXgCAkHC_wPcqLnansu8AUBtaU40zuAAwNMxo-t1oPAYWggjvhMv7qs4gTAou2FffC4Z8QF9fApl6JIrvrD9LrDOB3bFdJvgIzqnDOFKFgdOZ_gw7-LuRqQPRA8DDZKiF4LkeYN6yjX6imlr77qEazizciNeMjnrMkokvTLvOE3kfUN2tmo6ePVGGtu28ujF-WQsfTvm9Cf3UTzVrkzLpwcTOjcA6spIltQwGJOs3nBD3o2pxhgFFoqpHp6BJqfV1bcuE8fQ9YKgCd94HpKox-uWZrfi7A | |url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180728185043id_/https://watermark.silverchair.com/fmt020.pdf?token=AQECAHi208BE49Ooan9kkhW_Ercy7Dm3ZL_9Cf3qfKAc485ysgAAAaYwggGiBgkqhkiG9w0BBwagggGTMIIBjwIBADCCAYgGCSqGSIb3DQEHATAeBglghkgBZQMEAS4wEQQMyFWECbJanngkvwpcAgEQgIIBWarThATgppuUKQzxaV3_BbTkmLgAc-cv46UnwsNw92ePBelfKGEIQDBLDq00bwJkpf_aT9o9Ga5J5ddgE_-UHAlyYWRgDk31U6VQIZswyklAl4pJh6rxz5IzRtKxZah7n6yDWZGmrgR3ujXyGdhX49fMVdkEE8Zz1IQtxT2H6eZOByvkvXgCAkHC_wPcqLnansu8AUBtaU40zuAAwNMxo-t1oPAYWggjvhMv7qs4gTAou2FffC4Z8QF9fApl6JIrvrD9LrDOB3bFdJvgIzqnDOFKFgdOZ_gw7-LuRqQPRA8DDZKiF4LkeYN6yjX6imlr77qEazizciNeMjnrMkokvTLvOE3kfUN2tmo6ePVGGtu28ujF-WQsfTvm9Cf3UTzVrkzLpwcTOjcA6spIltQwGJOs3nBD3o2pxhgFFoqpHp6BJqfV1bcuE8fQ9YKgCd94HpKox-uWZrfi7A | ||
− | |archived= | + | |archived=yes |
|quote= | |quote= | ||
|pubmedID=23598893 | |pubmedID=23598893 | ||
Line 56: | Line 82: | ||
|DOI=10.1093/tropej/fmt020 | |DOI=10.1093/tropej/fmt020 | ||
|accessdate=2022-02-21 | |accessdate=2022-02-21 | ||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
}}</ref> | }}</ref> | ||
+ | |||
+ | Ekenze & Ezomike (2013) treated these cases by release of glanular adhesion, excision of the redundant [[prepuce]] and refashioning to achieve good cosmesis.<ref name="ekenze2013" /> | ||
+ | |||
{{REF}} | {{REF}} | ||
− | |||
[[Category:Circumcision complication]] | [[Category:Circumcision complication]] | ||
[[Category:Circumcision risk]] | [[Category:Circumcision risk]] | ||
[[Category:Circumcision in Africa]] | [[Category:Circumcision in Africa]] | ||
+ | |||
+ | [[de:Drüsenadhäsion (der Restvorhaut)]] |
Latest revision as of 21:42, 15 May 2023
Glandular adhesion (of remnant foreskin) is a complication of circumcision that occurs primarily when child circumcision is performed by traditional practitioners in developing nations.[1] [2][3]
Ekenze & Ezomike (2013) treated these cases by release of glanular adhesion, excision of the redundant prepuce and refashioning to achieve good cosmesis.[3]
References
- ↑ Osifo OD, Oriaifo IA. Circumcision mishaps in Nigerian children. Ann Afr Med. October 2009; 8(4): 266-70. PMID. DOI. Retrieved 21 February 2022. Example
- ↑ Tempark T, Wu T, Singer C. Dermatological complications of circumcision: lesson learned from cases in a pediatric dermatology practice. Pediatr Dermatol. 20 May 2013; 30(5): 519-28. PMID. DOI. Retrieved 21 January 2022.
- ↑ a b Ekenze SO, Ezomike UO. Complications of Neonatal Circumcision Requiring Surgical Intervention in a Developing Country (archive URL) August 2013; 59(4): 292-7. PMID. DOI. Retrieved 21 February 2022.