Difference between revisions of "Jennifer A. Bossio"

From IntactiWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Add format.)
(Add category.)
 
(13 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
−
Adjunct Assistant Professor '''{{FULLPAGENAME}}''', M.Sc., Ph.D., C. Psych., is a Canadian psychologist at [https://www.queensu.ca/ Queens University] in the [https://urology.queensu.ca/faculty/jennifer-bossio Department of Urology].
+
Adjunct Assistant Professor '''{{FULLPAGENAME}}''', {{MS}}, {{PhD}}, C. Psych., is a Canadian psychologist in the [https://urology.queensu.ca/faculty/jennifer-bossio Department of Urology] at [https://www.queensu.ca/ Queens University] in Kingston, Ontario.<ref>{{REFweb
 +
|url=https://trihealthclinic.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/Jennifer-Bossio_CV.pdf
 +
|title=Curriculum Vitae
 +
|last=Bossio
 +
|first=Jennifer
 +
|init=
 +
|author-link=
 +
|publisher=
 +
|date=2023-01
 +
|accessdate=2024-12-16
 +
}}</ref>
  
 
Dr. Bossio also maintains a private practice.<ref>{{REFweb
 
Dr. Bossio also maintains a private practice.<ref>{{REFweb
Line 114: Line 124:
 
  |accessdate=2024-12-15
 
  |accessdate=2024-12-15
 
}}
 
}}
 +
* {{REFjournal
 +
|last=Bossio
 +
|first=
 +
|init=JA
 +
|author-link=Jennifer A. Bossio
 +
|last2=Pukall
 +
|first2=
 +
|init2=CF
 +
|author2-link=
 +
|etal=no
 +
|title=Attitude Toward One's Circumcision Status Is More Important than Actual Circumcision Status for Men's Body Image and Sexual Functioning
 +
|trans-title=
 +
|journal=Arch Sex Behav
 +
|date=2018-04
 +
|volume=47
 +
|issue=3
 +
|pages=771-81
 +
|url=https://www.arclaw.org/wp-content/uploads/Bossio-Attitudes-Circ-Status-ArchSexBeh-2017.pdf
 +
|archived=
 +
|quote=
 +
|pubmedID=28894958
 +
|pubmedCID=
 +
|DOI=10.1007/s10508-017-1064-8
 +
|format=PDF
 +
|accessdate=2024-12-15
 +
}}
 +
==Critical commentary==
 +
Bossio et al. (2016) have argued that, "Penile sensitivity did not differ across circumcision status for any stimulus type or penile site."<ref>{{REFjournal
 +
|last=Bossio
 +
|first=
 +
|init=JA
 +
|author-link=Jennifer A. Bossio
 +
|last2=Pukall
 +
|first2=
 +
|init2=CF
 +
|author2-link=
 +
|last3=Steele
 +
|first3=
 +
|init3=SS
 +
|author3-link=
 +
|etal=no
 +
|title=Examining Penile Sensitivity in Neonatally Circumcised and Intact Men Using Qualitative Sensory Testing
 +
|trans-title=
 +
|language=
 +
|journal=J Urol
 +
|location=
 +
|date=2016-06
 +
|volume=195
 +
|issue=6
 +
|pages=1848-53
 +
|url=https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26724395/
 +
|archived=
 +
|quote=The foreskin of intact men was more sensitive to tactile stimulation than the other penile sites
 +
|pubmedID=26724395
 +
|pubmedCID=
 +
|DOI=10.1016/j.juro.2015.12.080
 +
|accessdate=2024-12-15
 +
}}</ref> This is an outlier position that is in conflict with several other studies.
 +
 +
[[Brian D. Earp]], Ph.D. (2016) has published a significant criticism of the work of Bossio et al.<ref name="earp2016">{{REFjournal
 +
|last=Earp
 +
|first=
 +
|init=BD
 +
|author-link=Brian D. Earp
 +
|etal=no
 +
|title=Circumcision and Sexual Function: Bad Science Reporting Misleads Parents
 +
|trans-title=
 +
|language=
 +
|journal=Journal of Medical Ethics
 +
|location=
 +
|date=2016-04-22
 +
|season=
 +
|volume=
 +
|issue=
 +
|article=
 +
|page=
 +
|pages=
 +
|url=https://blogs.bmj.com/medical-ethics/2016/04/22/circumcision-and-sexual-function-bad-science-reporting-misleads-parents/
 +
|archived=
 +
|quote=
 +
|pubmedID=
 +
|pubmedCID=
 +
|DOI=
 +
|doi=
 +
|accessdate=2024-12-16
 +
}}</ref>
 +
 +
Earp commented:
 +
<blockquote>
 +
With respect to the specific question of “sensitivity,” the latest findings are a lot less definitive than media reports are making them out to be (and they don’t even all point in the same direction as those reports are suggesting). As Bossio and her colleagues state at the end of their paper, “replication of this study is warranted with a larger sample size” and “associated conclusions should be interpreted as preliminary.”<ref name="earp2016" />
 +
</blockquote>
 +
 +
Earp concluded:
 +
<blockquote>
 +
In the meantime, a precautionary approach suggests that we should leave boys’ penises alone until they can assess the sensitivity of their own foreskins as compared to other parts of the penis—as well as their role in sexual experience more generally—in light of their own considered sexual preferences and values.<ref name="earp2016" />
 +
</blockquote>
 
{{SEEALSO}}
 
{{SEEALSO}}
 
* [[Sexual effects of circumcision]]
 
* [[Sexual effects of circumcision]]
Line 119: Line 225:
  
 
{{LINKS}}
 
{{LINKS}}
−
 
 
* {{URLwebsite|https://urology.queensu.ca/faculty/jennifer-bossio|2024-12-15}}
 
* {{URLwebsite|https://urology.queensu.ca/faculty/jennifer-bossio|2024-12-15}}
  
 +
{{ABBR}}
 
{{REF}}
 
{{REF}}
−
 
  
 
{{DEFAULTSORT:Bossio, Jennifer A.}}
 
{{DEFAULTSORT:Bossio, Jennifer A.}}
Line 129: Line 234:
 
[[Category:Person]]
 
[[Category:Person]]
 
[[Category:Female]]
 
[[Category:Female]]
 +
 
[[Category:Psychologist]]
 
[[Category:Psychologist]]
 
[[Category:Author]]
 
[[Category:Author]]
 +
[[Category:Psychology]]
 +
[[Category:Researcher]]
 +
[[Category:Sexuality]]
  
 
[[Category:Canada]]
 
[[Category:Canada]]

Latest revision as of 11:39, 18 December 2024

Adjunct Assistant Professor Jennifer A. Bossio, M.S.[a 1], Ph.D.[a 2], C. Psych., is a Canadian psychologist in the Department of Urology at Queens University in Kingston, Ontario.[1]

Dr. Bossio also maintains a private practice.[2]

Publications

Critical commentary

Bossio et al. (2016) have argued that, "Penile sensitivity did not differ across circumcision status for any stimulus type or penile site."[3] This is an outlier position that is in conflict with several other studies.

Brian D. Earp, Ph.D. (2016) has published a significant criticism of the work of Bossio et al.[4]

Earp commented:

With respect to the specific question of “sensitivity,” the latest findings are a lot less definitive than media reports are making them out to be (and they don’t even all point in the same direction as those reports are suggesting). As Bossio and her colleagues state at the end of their paper, “replication of this study is warranted with a larger sample size” and “associated conclusions should be interpreted as preliminary.”[4]

Earp concluded:

In the meantime, a precautionary approach suggests that we should leave boys’ penises alone until they can assess the sensitivity of their own foreskins as compared to other parts of the penis—as well as their role in sexual experience more generally—in light of their own considered sexual preferences and values.[4]

See also

External links

Abbreviations

  1. ↑ REFweb Master of Science, Wikipedia. Retrieved 13 October 2021. (Latin: magisterii scientiae; also abbreviated MS, MSc, M.Sc., SM, S.M., ScM or Sc.M.)
  2. ↑ REFweb Doctor of Philosophy, Wikipedia. Retrieved 16 June 2021. (Also abbreviated as D.Phil.)

References

  1. ↑ REFweb Bossio, Jennifer (January 2023). Curriculum Vitae. Retrieved 16 December 2024.
  2. ↑ REFweb Bossio, Jenn. Meet Dr. Jenn Bossio, C.Psych, Tri Health Clinic. Retrieved 15 December 2024.
  3. ↑ REFjournal Bossio JA, Pukall CF, Steele SS. Examining Penile Sensitivity in Neonatally Circumcised and Intact Men Using Qualitative Sensory Testing. J Urol. June 2016; 195(6): 1848-53. PMID. DOI. Retrieved 15 December 2024.
    Quote: The foreskin of intact men was more sensitive to tactile stimulation than the other penile sites
  4. ↑ a b c REFjournal Earp BD. Circumcision and Sexual Function: Bad Science Reporting Misleads Parents. Journal of Medical Ethics. 22 April 2016; Retrieved 16 December 2024.
Retrieved from "https://en.intactiwiki.org/w/index.php?title=Jennifer_A._Bossio&oldid=40246"