15,658
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
{{Construction Site}}'''Illinois: Judge Says No to Circumcision for Boy''' is the headline used by the ''New York Times'' on 25 October 2006 for a report on the historic, precedent-setting Schmidt v. Niznik case in Chicago, Illinois in which the court prohibited the [[circumcision]] of a boy until he is old enough to decide for himself.
'''Illinois: Judge Says No to Circumcision The case represented a victory for Boy''' is the headline used by the ''New York Times'' on 25 October 2006 for a report on the historic Schmidt v[[genital autonomy movement]]. Niznik The case in Chicago, Illinois in which the court prohibited the circumcision of boy until he is old enough to decide for himselfgenerate substantial media comment.
Add text; remove Construction Zone template.
{{SEEALSO}}
|date=2006-10-25
|accessdate=2020-06-06
|quote=The judge, Jordan Kaplan of Circuit Court in Cook County, said that the procedure was “an extraordinary medical procedure” for a 9-year-old and that the boy could decide for himself when he turned 18.
}}