Difference between revisions of "Political attitutes towards MGM"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Created page with "{{Construction Site}} While FGM is outlawed in almost every country, most countries still ignore, tolerate or accept MGM on minors. This is a classical bias situat...") |
m |
||
| Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
{{REF}} | {{REF}} | ||
| + | [[Category:Political]] | ||
[[Category:Legislative initiative]] | [[Category:Legislative initiative]] | ||
| + | |||
| + | [[Category:Norway]] | ||
[[de:Politische Einstellungen zu MGM]] | [[de:Politische Einstellungen zu MGM]] | ||
Revision as of 10:45, 2 April 2020
Construction Site
This article is work in progress and not yet part of the free encyclopedia IntactiWiki.
While FGM is outlawed in almost every country, most countries still ignore, tolerate or accept MGM on minors. This is a classical bias situation. Furthermore, every country worldwide punishes bodily harm. MGM on minors without any medical indication is bodily harm by definition.
Work in progress: The following information does not claim to be complete. More content will be added gradually.
This page tries to collect political attitutes and points of view on this topic. To begin with, we're collecting statements of political parties here.
Norway
FrP
- 2017: Voted to ban the ritual circumcision of boys under the age of 16.[1]
- 2017: Voted to ban hijabs in public schools.[1]
References
- ↑ a b
Revesz, Rachael (8 May 2017). Norwegian ruling party votes to ban circumcision for men under 16 years old
, Independent. Retrieved 2 April 2020.
