Difference between revisions of "The case against circumcision"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
WikiModEn2 (talk | contribs) (Add text.) |
WikiModEn2 (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 126: | Line 126: | ||
|title=The case against circumcision | |title=The case against circumcision | ||
|journal=Journal of Men's Health and Gender | |journal=Journal of Men's Health and Gender | ||
| − | |date=2007 | + | |date=2007-09 |
|volume=4 | |volume=4 | ||
|issue=3 | |issue=3 | ||
Revision as of 12:55, 1 October 2020
The case against circumcision or similar is a title that has been selected by several writers.
Anonymous. The case against neonatal circumcision. BMJ. 5 May 1979; (6172): 1163-4. PMID. PMC. Retrieved 1 October 2020.
Grogano, E. B.. The case against neonatal circumcision. BMJ. 26 May 1979; 1(6175): 1423. PMID. PMC. DOI. Retrieved 1 October 2020.
Fleiss, Paul M., Douglass, John. The case against neonatal circumcision. BMJ. 1 September 1979; 2(6189): 554. PMID. PMC. DOI. Retrieved 1 October 2010.
Warren, John, Bigelow, Jim. The case against circumcision.. The British Journal of Sexual Medicine. October 1994; : 6-8. Retrieved 1 October 2010.
Hill, George. The case against circumcision. Journal of Men's Health and Gender. September 2007; 4(3): 318-323. Retrieved 1 October 2020.