Redundant foreskin: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m adjust REF |
WikiModEn2 (talk | contribs) Add inline links. |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
'''Insufficient foreskin removal/redundant foreskin''' is classed technically as a complication. The major issue is cosmetic because the expected circumcised appearance has not been achieved. There are no health issues from insufficient foreskin removal. A circumcision revision is usually carried out to achieve the desired appearance.<ref>{{REFjournal | '''Insufficient foreskin removal/redundant foreskin''' is classed technically as a complication. The major issue is cosmetic because the expected circumcised appearance has not been achieved. There are no health issues from insufficient [[foreskin]] removal. A [[Adolescent and adult circumcision| circumcision]] revision is usually carried out to achieve the desired appearance.<ref>{{REFjournal | ||
|last=Fekete | |last=Fekete | ||
|first=Ferenc | |first=Ferenc | ||
| Line 30: | Line 30: | ||
|accessdate=2022-02-04 | |accessdate=2022-02-04 | ||
}}</ref> | }}</ref> | ||
There is no accepted definition of redundant foreskin. | |||
{{SEEALSO}} | {{SEEALSO}} | ||
Revision as of 16:10, 4 February 2022
Insufficient foreskin removal/redundant foreskin is classed technically as a complication. The major issue is cosmetic because the expected circumcised appearance has not been achieved. There are no health issues from insufficient foreskin removal. A circumcision revision is usually carried out to achieve the desired appearance.[1]
There is no accepted definition of redundant foreskin.
See also
References
- ↑
Fekete F, Török A, Nyirády P. Revisions after unsatisfactory adult circumcisions. Int Urol Nephrol. June 2011; 43(2): 431-5. PMID. DOI. Retrieved 4 February 2022.
