Fishbeck v. North Dakota: Difference between revisions

Line 1:

'''Fishbeck v. North Dakota''' is a North Dakota legal case from the year of 1996 that was filed by Donna Fishbeck and others on behalf of her infant son, Jonathan Fishbeck, who had been circumcised. The plaintiffs were represented by [[Zenas Baer]] of Hawley, Minnesota. The case was filed in the United States District Court for the District of North Dakota. It named the State of North Dakota as the defendant.<ref name="complaint1996">{{REFweb

'''Fishbeck v. North Dakota''' is a North Dakota legal case from the year of 1996 that was filed by Donna Fishbeck and others on behalf of her infant son, Jonathan Fishbeck, who had been [[circumcised]]. The plaintiffs were represented by [[Zenas Baer]] of Hawley, Minnesota. The case was filed in the United States District Court for the District of North Dakota. It named the State of North Dakota as the defendant.<ref name="complaint1996">{{REFweb

|url=http://www.boystoo.com/legal/fgmdistrict1.htm#Original%20Complaint

|archived=

Line 81:

This case was dismissed on procedural grounds. At no time were the merits of the case considered.

* [[Gajewski v. State of North Dakota (2010)]]

* http://www.boystoo.com/legal/fgmdistrict1.htm

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
-'''Fishbeck v. North Dakota''' is a North Dakota legal case from the year of 1996 that was filed by Donna Fishbeck and others on behalf of her infant son, Jonathan Fishbeck, who had been circumcised. The plaintiffs were represented by [[Zenas Baer]] of Hawley, Minnesota.  The case was filed in the United States District Court for the District of North Dakota. It named the State of North Dakota as the defendant.<ref name="complaint1996">{{REFweb
+'''Fishbeck v. North Dakota''' is a North Dakota legal case from the year of 1996 that was filed by Donna Fishbeck and others on behalf of her infant son, Jonathan Fishbeck, who had been [[circumcised]]. The plaintiffs were represented by [[Zenas Baer]] of Hawley, Minnesota.  The case was filed in the United States District Court for the District of North Dakota. It named the State of North Dakota as the defendant.<ref name="complaint1996">{{REFweb
   |url=http://www.boystoo.com/legal/fgmdistrict1.htm#Original%20Complaint
   |archived=
@@ Line 81: / Line 81: @@
 This case was dismissed on procedural grounds. At no time were the merits of the case considered.
+{{SEEALSO}}
+* [[Gajewski v. State of North Dakota (2010)]]
 {{LINKS}}
 * http://www.boystoo.com/legal/fgmdistrict1.htm