London v. Glasser et al.: Difference between revisions

Create page.
 
Add text and citation.
Line 17: Line 17:
  |url=https://thorium.rocks/misc/sexuallymutilatedchild.org/a-london.htm
  |url=https://thorium.rocks/misc/sexuallymutilatedchild.org/a-london.htm
  |title=Adam London Circumcision Lawsuit Brief  
  |title=Adam London Circumcision Lawsuit Brief  
|last=
|first=
|init=
  |publisher=
  |publisher=
  |date=
  |date=
  |accessdate=2023-10-26
  |accessdate=2023-10-26
}}</ref> however, the appeal also was not successful.<ref name="morris1989" />
}}</ref> however, the appeal also was not successful.<ref name="morris1989" />
A petition for review was filed with the [https://supreme.courts.ca.gov/ California Supreme Court], however it was denied.<ref name="morris1989" />
Although federal issues were involved that would support an appeal to United States Supreme Court, financial issues prevented further appeal.<ref name="morris1989" />


{{REF}}
{{REF}}