Difference between revisions of "Medical literature about child circumcision"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
WikiModEn2 (talk | contribs) (→Articles: Add article.) |
WikiModEn2 (talk | contribs) (→Articles: Add article) |
||
Line 183: | Line 183: | ||
|DOI=10.1016/0002-9378(78)90353-8 | |DOI=10.1016/0002-9378(78)90353-8 | ||
|accessdate=2024-06-16 | |accessdate=2024-06-16 | ||
+ | }} | ||
+ | {{REFjournal | ||
+ | |last=Dalton | ||
+ | |first= | ||
+ | |init=JD | ||
+ | |author-link= | ||
+ | |etal=no | ||
+ | |title=Male circumcision – see the harm to get a balanced picture | ||
+ | |trans-title= | ||
+ | |language= | ||
+ | |journal=J Mens Health Gend | ||
+ | |location= | ||
+ | |date=2007-09 | ||
+ | |volume=4 | ||
+ | |issue=3 | ||
+ | |article= | ||
+ | |page= | ||
+ | |pages= | ||
+ | |url=https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1571891307001100 | ||
+ | |archived= | ||
+ | |quote= | ||
+ | |pubmedID= | ||
+ | |pubmedCID= | ||
+ | |DOI= | ||
+ | |doi= | ||
+ | |accessdate=2024-06-15 | ||
+ | }} | ||
+ | * {{REFjournal | ||
+ | |last=Hill | ||
+ | |first= | ||
+ | |init=G | ||
+ | |author-link=George Hill | ||
+ | |title=The case against circumcision | ||
+ | |journal=J Mens Health Gend | ||
+ | |date=2007 | ||
+ | |volume=4 | ||
+ | |issue=3 | ||
+ | |pages=318-23 | ||
+ | |url=https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/document?repid=rep1&type=pdf&doi=04ace5046cc27f01b8fbe4aa359c059778983912 | ||
+ | |quote= | ||
+ | |format=PDF | ||
+ | |accessdate=2024-06-15 | ||
}} | }} |
Revision as of 13:51, 16 June 2024
Construction Site
This article is work in progress and not yet part of the free encyclopedia IntactiWiki.
This page collects and indexes Medical literature about child circumcision.
Introduction
A number of reviews of the practice of child circumcision have been published. This page collects the more significant articles.
Articles
- Gairdner DMT. The fate of the foreskin: a study of circumcision. British Medical Journal. 1949; 2(4642): 1433-7. PMID. PMC. DOI. Retrieved 28 October 2019.
- Morgan WKC. The rape of the phallus. JAMA. 19 July 1965; 193(3): 123-4. PMID. DOI. Retrieved 15 June 2024.
- Wright JE. Non-therapeutic circumcision. Med J Aust. 27 May 1967; 1(21): 1083-6. PMID. Retrieved 15 June 2024.
- Morgan WKC. Penile plunder. Med J Aust. 27 May 1967; 1(21): 102-3. PMID. DOI. Retrieved 15 June 2024.
- Leitch IOW. Circumcision. A continuing enigma. Aust Paediatr J. June 1970; 6(2): 59-65. PMID. Retrieved June 2024.
- Preston EN. Whither the foreskin? A consideration of routine neonatal circumcision. JAMA. 14 September 1970; 213(11): 1853-8. PMID. DOI. Retrieved 15 June 2024.
- Falliers CJ. Circumcision. JAMA. 21 December 1970; 214(12): 2194. Retrieved 15 June 2024.
- Patel H. The problem of routine infant circumcision. Can Med Assoc J. 10 September 1966; 95(11): 576-81. PMID. PMC. Retrieved 15 May 2024.
- Grimes DA. Routine circumcision of the newborn infant: a reappraisal. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 15 January 1978; 130(2): 125-9. PMID. DOI. Retrieved 16 June 2024.
Dalton JD. Male circumcision – see the harm to get a balanced picture. J Mens Health Gend. September 2007; 4(3) Retrieved 15 June 2024.
- Hill G. The case against circumcision . J Mens Health Gend. 2007; 4(3): 318-23. Retrieved 15 June 2024.