Difference between revisions of "Psychological literature about male circumcision"

From IntactiWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Articles: Add article)
(Articles: Add article.)
Line 84: Line 84:
 
  |doi=10.1001/archpedi.1945.02020130014003
 
  |doi=10.1001/archpedi.1945.02020130014003
 
  |accessdate=2024-06-22
 
  |accessdate=2024-06-22
 +
}}
 +
* {{REFjournal
 +
|last= Nunberg
 +
|init=H
 +
|author-link=Herman Nunberg
 +
|url=https://pep-web.org/search/document/IJP.028.0145A
 +
|title=Circumcision and problems of bisexuality
 +
|journal=The International Journal of Psycho-Analysis
 +
|date=1947-01-01
 +
|volume=28
 +
|issue=
 +
|pages=145-79
 +
|pubmedID=12994301
 +
|accessdate=2023-10-04
 
}}
 
}}
 
* {{REFjournal
 
* {{REFjournal

Revision as of 21:19, 22 June 2024

Construction Site

This article is work in progress and not yet part of the free encyclopedia IntactiWiki.

 

This page collects and indexes psychological literature about male circumcision.

Work in progress: The following information does not claim to be complete. More content will be added gradually.

Introduction

The circumcision industry would like parents and the public to believe that circumcision is psychologically benign and has no effect on the patient, therefore the information provided to satisfy the requirements of informed consent typically excludes any discussion of the psychological trauma, injury, and effects of circumcision.

Some of the literature cited here will include certain articles of a psychological nature that appeared in medical journals.

Articles