Psychological literature about male circumcision: Difference between revisions

Introduction: Add categories.
Line 5: Line 5:


==Introduction==
==Introduction==
The [[circumcision industry]] would like parents and the public to believe that [[circumcision]] is psychologically benign and has no effect on the patient, therefore the information provided to satisfy the requirements of [[informed consent]] typically excludes any discussion of the psychological [[trauma]], injury, and effects of circumcision.<ref> </ref>
The [[circumcision industry]] would like parents and the public to believe that [[circumcision]] is psychologically benign and has no effect on the patient, therefore the information provided to satisfy the requirements of [[informed consent]] typically excludes any discussion of the psychological [[trauma]], injury, and other effects of circumcision.<ref name="tye2023">{{REFjournal
|last=Tye
|first=
|init=MC
|author-link=
|last2=Sardi
|first2=
|init2=LM
|author2-link=
|etal=no
|title=Psychological, psychosocial, and psychosexual aspects of penile circumcision
|trans-title=
|language=
|journal=Int J Impot Res
|location=
|date=2023-05
|volume=35
|issue=3
|pages=242-8
|url=https://www.nature.com/articles/s41443-022-00553-9
|archived=
|quote=Policy statements on penile circumcision have focused primarily on disease, dysfunction, or sensation, with relatively little consideration of psychological and psychosocial implications of the procedure. There has also been minimal consideration of potential qualitative changes in the subjective experience of sexual activity following changes in penile anatomy (foreskin removal) or associated sexual biomechanics.
|pubmedID=35347302
|DOI=10.1038/s41443-022-00553-9
|accessdate=2024-06-22
}}</ref>


Some of the literature cited here will include certain articles of a psychological nature that appeared in medical journals.
Some of the literature cited here will include certain articles of a psychological nature that appeared in medical journals.
Line 243: Line 268:
  |issue=3
  |issue=3
  |pages=242-8
  |pages=242-8
  |url=
  |url=https://www.nature.com/articles/s41443-022-00553-9
  |archived=
  |archived=
  |quote=Policy statements on penile circumcision have focused primarily on disease, dysfunction, or sensation, with relatively little consideration of psychological and psychosocial implications of the procedure. There has also been minimal consideration of potential qualitative changes in the subjective experience of sexual activity following changes in penile anatomy (foreskin removal) or associated sexual biomechanics.
  |quote=Policy statements on penile circumcision have focused primarily on disease, dysfunction, or sensation, with relatively little consideration of psychological and psychosocial implications of the procedure. There has also been minimal consideration of potential qualitative changes in the subjective experience of sexual activity following changes in penile anatomy (foreskin removal) or associated sexual biomechanics.
Line 251: Line 276:
}}
}}
{{REF}}
{{REF}}
[[Category:Circumcision]]
[[Category:Male sexuality]]
[[Category:Psychology]]
[[Category:Trauma]]