15,755
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
→Physical aspects: Delete spurious material
}}</ref>
Some men who have undertaken foreskin restoration report a visibly smoother glans, which some of these men attribute to decreased levels of [[keratinization]] following restoration. A study that investigated the effect of glans coverage on levels of keratinization found no difference in keratin levels<ref>{{REFweb | quote= | url=http://bmj.bmjjournals.com/cgi/content/full/320/7249/1592 | title=How does male circumcision protect against HIV infection? | last= | first= | publisher= | work= | date= | accessdate=}}</ref> within the group studied.
Several studies have suggested that the glans is equally sensitive in circumcised and uncircumcised males,<ref name="masters">{{REFbook